Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship Program, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
University of California San Diego/Scripps Health Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship Program, Scripps Health, San Diego, California, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):1009-1017.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
A physician workgroup of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine sought to define curricular milestones (CMs) for hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) Fellowship Programs. The developed list of CMs would serve as components upon which to organize curriculum and standardize what to teach during training. These would complement entrustable professional activities previously developed by this group and new specialty-specific reporting milestones (RMs) for HPM developed through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
The objective of this study was to develop and vet CMs for HPM fellowships in the U.S.
A draft of CMs was developed through an iterative consensus group process with repeated cycles of drafting, analyzing, and revising by a broadly representative expert workgroup who then gained input from HPM educators at a national meeting workshop. The CM draft was subsequently revised and then vetted through a national survey to 203 fellowship educators. Respondents were asked to "keep," "revise," or "exclude" each proposed CM with space for comments. An agreement of 75% among respondents was set as the criteria a priori for keeping a CM. Eighty-four of the 203 potential respondents participated in the survey. All items met the minimum agreement level of 75% or greater recommending keeping the CM. Greater than 85% of the respondents agreed to keep 19 of the 22 CMs with no revisions. Comments for revisions on other CMs were primarily related to changes in language and formatting, not conceptual underpinnings.
A group consensus method strengthened by inclusion of a national survey to HPM fellowship educators resulted in a CM document that is both carefully developed and broadly vetted. Along with entrustable professional activities and new specialty-specific RMs, these CMs offer educators and trainees tools to create more comprehensive curricula and behaviorally based assessment tools for HPM fellowships and their stakeholders.
美国临终关怀和姑息医学学院的一个医师工作组试图为临终关怀和姑息医学(HPM)研究员项目定义课程里程碑(CM)。制定的 CM 清单将作为组织课程和标准化培训内容的组成部分。这些将补充该小组之前制定的可委托专业活动以及通过研究生医学教育认证委员会为 HPM 制定的新的专业特定报告里程碑(RM)。
本研究的目的是为美国的 HPM 研究员制定和审查 CM。
通过具有广泛代表性的专家工作组的迭代共识小组过程制定了 CM 草案,该工作组通过反复的起草、分析和修订周期,然后在全国会议研讨会上从 HPM 教育者那里获得意见。CM 草案随后进行了修订,然后通过向 203 名研究员教育者进行全国调查进行审查。要求受访者“保留”、“修改”或“排除”每个拟议的 CM,并留出评论空间。受访者达成 75%的一致意见作为保留 CM 的事先标准。在 203 名潜在受访者中,有 84 名参与了调查。所有项目都达到了保留 CM 的最低 75%的同意水平。超过 85%的受访者同意保留 22 个 CM 中的 19 个,无需修改。对其他 CM 的修订意见主要涉及语言和格式的更改,而不是概念基础。
通过纳入对 HPM 研究员的全国调查,使用小组共识方法加强了对 CM 的审查,从而制定了一份既精心制定又广泛审查的 CM 文件。与可委托的专业活动和新的专业特定 RM 一起,这些 CM 为教育者和学员提供了工具,为 HPM 研究员及其利益相关者创建更全面的课程和基于行为的评估工具。