Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Camaragibe, PE, Brazil.
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Araçatuba, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;48(9):1241-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
The aim of this systematic review was to test the following hypotheses: (1) that there is no difference in implant survival rate between individuals with overweight or obesity and those who are within the ideal weight range; (2) that there are no differences between these groups regarding indicators of peri-implant health. Two independent reviewers performed a literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published up to April 1, 2018. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the risk difference for implant failure and mean difference for marginal bone loss, probing depth, and bleeding on probing. Six studies were selected for review, involving a total of 746 patients with 986 implants: 609 in overweight or obese individuals and 377 in individuals within the ideal weight range. The findings of this systematic review indicate that the first hypothesis should be accepted, since no statistically significant difference in implant survival rate was found between individuals with overweight/obesity and those within the ideal weight range (P=0.64). The second hypothesis was rejected, as the review indicated a difference in marginal bone loss (P<0.00001), probing depth (P<0.00001), and bleeding around dental implants (P<0.00001).
(1)超重或肥胖个体与处于理想体重范围内的个体之间,种植体存活率无差异;(2)两组间种植体周围健康指标无差异。两名独立的审查员对截至 2018 年 4 月 1 日发表的研究,在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了文献检索。采用荟萃分析来确定种植体失败的风险差异和边缘骨丧失、探诊深度和探诊出血的平均差异。共选择了 6 项研究进行综述,共涉及 746 名患者的 986 个种植体:超重/肥胖个体 609 例,理想体重范围内个体 377 例。本系统评价的结果表明,应接受第一个假设,因为超重/肥胖个体与处于理想体重范围内的个体之间,种植体存活率无统计学差异(P=0.64)。第二个假设被拒绝,因为综述表明边缘骨丧失(P<0.00001)、探诊深度(P<0.00001)和种植体周围出血(P<0.00001)存在差异。