Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Cell Death Dis. 2019 Feb 21;10(3):177. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1407-6.
The BCl-2 family has long been identified for its role in apoptosis. Following the initial discovery of BCL-2 in the context of B-cell lymphoma in the 1980s, a number of homologous proteins have since been identified. The members of the Bcl-2 family are designated as such due to their BCL-2 homology (BH) domains and involvement in apoptosis regulation. The BH domains facilitate the family members' interactions with each other and can indicate pro- or anti-apoptotic function. Traditionally, these proteins are categorised into one of the three subfamilies; anti-apoptotic, BH3-only (pro-apoptotic), and pore-forming or 'executioner' (pro-apoptotic) proteins. Each of the BH3-only or anti-apoptotic proteins has a distinct pattern of activation, localisation and response to cell death or survival stimuli. All of these can vary across cell or stress types, or developmental stage, and this can cause the delineation of the roles of BCL-2 family members. Added to this complexity is the presence of relatively uncharacterised isoforms of many of the BCL-2 family members. There is a gap in our knowledge regarding the function of BCL-2 family isoforms. BH domain status is not always predictive or indicative of protein function, and several other important sequences, which can contribute to apoptotic activity have been identified. While therapeutic strategies targeting the BCL-2 family are constantly under development, it is imperative that we understand the molecules, which we are attempting to target. This review, discusses our current knowledge of anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family isoforms. With significant improvements in the potential for splicing therapies, it is important that we begin to understand the distinctions of the BCL-2 family, not limited to just the mechanisms of apoptosis control, but in their roles outside of apoptosis.
BCL-2 家族长期以来因其在细胞凋亡中的作用而被确定。在 20 世纪 80 年代在 B 细胞淋巴瘤中首次发现 BCL-2 之后,此后又发现了许多同源蛋白。BCL-2 家族的成员之所以被这样命名,是因为它们具有 BCL-2 同源(BH)结构域,并参与细胞凋亡的调节。BH 结构域促进了家族成员之间的相互作用,并可以指示促凋亡或抗凋亡功能。传统上,这些蛋白可分为以下三个亚家族之一:抗凋亡、BH3 仅(促凋亡)和形成孔或“执行者”(促凋亡)蛋白。BH3 仅或抗凋亡蛋白中的每一种都具有独特的激活、定位和对细胞死亡或存活刺激的反应模式。所有这些都可以因细胞或应激类型或发育阶段的不同而有所不同,这可能导致 BCL-2 家族成员的作用划分。除了这些复杂性之外,许多 BCL-2 家族成员的相对特征不明的同工型也存在。我们对 BCL-2 家族同工型的功能知之甚少。BH 结构域状态并不总是具有预测性或指示蛋白功能,并且已经确定了几个其他重要的序列,这些序列可以促进细胞凋亡活性。虽然针对 BCL-2 家族的治疗策略不断在开发中,但我们了解我们试图靶向的分子至关重要。这篇综述讨论了我们目前对抗凋亡 BCL-2 家族同工型的认识。随着拼接疗法的潜在重大改进,了解 BCL-2 家族的区别变得非常重要,不仅限于细胞凋亡控制的机制,还包括它们在细胞凋亡之外的作用。