Suppr超能文献

肾输尿管切除术时的输尿管远端处理:系统评价和累积分析的证据。

Distal Ureter Management During Nephroureterectomy: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis.

机构信息

1 Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.

2 Glasgow Urological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2019 Apr;33(4):263-273. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0819. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Standard of care in upper tract urothelial cancer is nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision (BCE). However, alternative techniques such as transurethral incision/resection have been used to simplify distal ureterectomy. The optimum strategy is unclear, and current guidelines do not specify a gold standard technique. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature, to compare BCE and transurethral distal ureter methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Cochrane and PRISMA-guided systematic literature search was conducted on English language articles from January 2000 to present, reporting on centers' experience with either BCE or transurethral distal ureterectomy. A cumulative meta-analysis comparison between the two procedures was performed. Primary outcome was intravesical recurrence. Secondary outcomes were local/distant recurrence, surgical margins, and disease-specific mortality (DSM). Groups were compared using chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 66 studies were included after excluding 1795. BCE and transurethral groups contained 6130 and 1183 patients, respectively. Mean/median age ranged from 57.5 to 75.2 years, and follow-up from 6.1 to 78 months. Level of evidence was low, with high risk of bias and small sample size (<100 patients) in 41 (62%) and 52 (79%) studies, respectively. Baseline cancer demographic analysis identified significantly higher rates of high grade, advanced stage, node-positive and carcinoma in situ disease in the BCE group. However, intravesical recurrence (23.6% vs 28.7%, p = 0.0002) and local/distant recurrence (17.9% vs 21.6%, p = 0.02) were significantly lower than the transurethral group. No difference was seen regarding surgical margins (3.1% vs 2.4%, p = 0.27) or DSM (16.8% vs 14.3%, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

No prospective, randomized comparisons exist for distal ureterectomy at nephroureterectomy. In this analysis, patients undergoing BCE had more advanced disease burden compared with the transurethral group. Despite this, the BCE group had statistically lower intravesical and local/distant recurrence. Further prospective research should be encouraged to identify gold standard ureter management.

摘要

介绍和目的

上尿路尿路上皮癌的标准治疗方法是肾输尿管切除术加膀胱袖套切除术(BCE)。然而,已经使用了经尿道切开/切除术等替代技术来简化远端输尿管切除术。最佳策略尚不清楚,目前的指南也没有指定金标准技术。本研究的目的是对文献进行系统回顾,比较 BCE 和经尿道远端输尿管方法。

材料和方法

根据 Cochrane 和 PRISMA 指南,对 2000 年 1 月至目前发表的英文文献进行了系统的文献检索,报告了中心采用 BCE 或经尿道远端输尿管切除术的经验。对两种手术方法进行了累积荟萃分析比较。主要结果是膀胱内复发。次要结果是局部/远处复发、手术切缘和疾病特异性死亡率(DSM)。使用卡方分析比较两组。

结果

共排除 1795 篇文献后,纳入 66 篇研究。BCE 和经尿道组分别包含 6130 例和 1183 例患者。平均/中位年龄为 57.5 岁至 75.2 岁,随访时间为 6.1 个月至 78 个月。证据水平低,41 项(62%)和 52 项(79%)研究的偏倚风险高,样本量小(<100 例)。基线癌症人群分析显示,BCE 组高级别、晚期、淋巴结阳性和原位癌的比例明显较高。然而,膀胱内复发(23.6% vs 28.7%,p=0.0002)和局部/远处复发(17.9% vs 21.6%,p=0.02)明显低于经尿道组。手术切缘(3.1% vs 2.4%,p=0.27)或 DSM(16.8% vs 14.3%,p=0.06)无差异。

结论

在肾输尿管切除术中,没有关于远端输尿管切除术的前瞻性、随机对照比较。在本分析中,与经尿道组相比,接受 BCE 的患者疾病负担更重。尽管如此,BCE 组的膀胱内和局部/远处复发的统计学发生率较低。应鼓励进一步进行前瞻性研究,以确定输尿管管理的金标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验