• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过诱导亚组研究精准医学中的治疗效果异质性。

Studying treatment-effect heterogeneity in precision medicine through induced subgroups.

作者信息

Sies Aniek, Demyttenaere Koen, Van Mechelen Iven

机构信息

a Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.

b Department of Neurosciences , KU Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(3):491-507. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1579220. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1080/10543406.2019.1579220
PMID:30794033
Abstract

Precision medicine, in the sense of tailoring the choice of medical treatment to patients' pretreatment characteristics, is nowadays gaining a lot of attention. Preferably, this tailoring should be realized in an evidence-based way, with key evidence in this regard pertaining to subgroups of patients that respond differentially to treatment (i.e., to subgroups involved in treatment-subgroup interactions). Often a-priori hypotheses on subgroups involved in treatment-subgroup interactions are lacking or are incomplete at best. Therefore, methods are needed that can induce such subgroups from empirical data on treatment effectiveness in a manner. Recently, quite a few such methods have been developed. So far, however, there is little empirical experience in their usage. This may be problematic for medical statisticians and statistically minded medical researchers, as many (nontrivial) choices have to be made during the data-analytic process. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the major concepts and considerations when using these methods. This discussion will be based on a systematic, conceptual, and technical analysis of the type of research questions at play, and of the type of data that the methods can handle along with the available software, and a review of available empirical evidence. We will illustrate all this with the analysis of a dataset comparing several anti-depressant treatments.

摘要

精准医学,即根据患者的治疗前特征来定制医疗治疗方案的选择,如今正受到广泛关注。理想情况下,这种定制应以循证方式实现,这方面的关键证据涉及对治疗反应不同的患者亚组(即参与治疗-亚组相互作用的亚组)。通常,关于参与治疗-亚组相互作用的亚组的先验假设要么缺乏,要么充其量也不完整。因此,需要能够从治疗效果的经验数据中以某种方式诱导出此类亚组的方法。最近,已经开发了不少这样的方法。然而,到目前为止,它们的使用经验还很少。这对于医学统计学家和有统计学思维的医学研究人员来说可能是个问题,因为在数据分析过程中必须做出许多(重要的)选择。本文的主要目的是讨论使用这些方法时的主要概念和注意事项。这种讨论将基于对所涉及的研究问题类型、这些方法能够处理的数据类型以及可用软件进行系统的、概念性的和技术性的分析,以及对现有经验证据的综述。我们将通过对一个比较几种抗抑郁治疗的数据集的分析来说明这一切。

相似文献

1
Studying treatment-effect heterogeneity in precision medicine through induced subgroups.通过诱导亚组研究精准医学中的治疗效果异质性。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(3):491-507. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1579220. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
2
Quint: An R package for the identification of subgroups of clients who differ in which treatment alternative is best for them.Quint:一个用于识别在何种治疗方案对他们最为合适方面存在差异的客户亚组的R软件包。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Jun;48(2):650-63. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0594-z.
3
Age-treatment subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.Cochrane 干预评价中年龄-处理亚组分析:一项荟萃流行病学研究。
BMC Med. 2019 Oct 21;17(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1420-8.
4
Biomarker threshold adaptive designs for survival endpoints.用于生存终点的生物标志物阈值适应性设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(6):1038-1054. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1434191. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
Generated effect modifiers (GEM's) in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中的生成效应修饰因素(GEM's)
Biostatistics. 2017 Jan;18(1):105-118. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw035. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
6
A comparative study of subgroup identification methods for differential treatment effect: Performance metrics and recommendations.亚组识别方法在差异化治疗效果中的比较研究:性能指标与建议。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3658-3678. doi: 10.1177/0962280217710570. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
7
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.随机对照试验中的亚组分析:量化假阳性和假阴性风险
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. doi: 10.3310/hta5330.
8
Multiplicity issues in exploratory subgroup analysis.探索性子组分析中的多重性问题。
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(1):63-81. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1397009. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
9
On Enrichment Strategies for Biomarker Stratified Clinical Trials.关于生物标志物分层临床试验的富集策略
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(2):292-308. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1379532. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
10
Bayesian Analysis: A Practical Approach to Interpret Clinical Trials and Create Clinical Practice Guidelines.贝叶斯分析:解读临床试验与制定临床实践指南的实用方法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Aug;10(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003563.

引用本文的文献

1
An interpretable framework to identify responsive subgroups from clinical trials regarding treatment effects: Application to treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage.一种从关于治疗效果的临床试验中识别反应性亚组的可解释框架:在脑出血治疗中的应用。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May 7;3(5):e0000493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000493. eCollection 2024 May.
2
AN OMNIBUS TEST FOR DETECTION OF SUBGROUP TREATMENT EFFECTS VIA DATA PARTITIONING.一种通过数据划分检测亚组治疗效果的综合检验。
Ann Appl Stat. 2022 Dec;16(4):2266-2278. doi: 10.1214/21-AOAS1589. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
3
Measuring individual benefits of psychiatric treatment using longitudinal binary outcomes: Application to antipsychotic benefits in non-cannabis and cannabis users.
使用纵向二分类结局衡量精神科治疗的个体获益:非大麻和大麻使用者抗精神病药物获益的应用。
J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Sep 2;30(5):916-940. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1765371. Epub 2020 Jun 8.