Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science (INB), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212781. eCollection 2019.
The effect of cadence and work rate on the joint specific power production in cycling has previously been studied, but research has primarily focused on cadences above 60 rpm, without examining the effect of low cadence on joint contribution to power.
Our purpose was to investigate joint specific power production in recreational and elite cyclists during low- and moderate cycling at a range of different cadences.
18 male cyclists (30.9 ± 2.7 years with a work rate in watt at lactate threshold of 282.3 ± 9.3 W) performed cycling bouts at seven different pedalling rates and three intensities. Joint specific power was calculated from kinematic measurements and pedal forces using inverse dynamics at a total of 21 different stages.
A main effect of cadence on the relative to the total joint power for hip-, knee- and ankle joint power was found (all p < 0.05). Increasing cadence led to increasing knee joint power and decreasing hip joint power (all p < 0.05), with the exception at low cadence (<60 rpm), where there was no effect of cadence. The elite cyclists had higher relative hip joint power compared to the recreational group (p < 0.05). The hip joint power at moderate intensity with a freely chosen cadence (FCC) was lower than the hip joint power at low intensity with a low cadence (<60 rpm) (p < 0.05).
This study demonstrates that there is an effect of cadence on the hip- and knee joint contribution in cycling, however, the effect only occurs from 60 rpm and upward. It also demonstrates that there is a difference in joint contribution between elite- and recreational cyclists, and provide evidence for the possibility of achieving higher relative hip joint power at low intensity than moderate intensity by altering the cadence.
先前已有研究探讨踏频和功频对踏车运动中关节比功率的影响,但这些研究主要集中在 60rpm 以上的踏频,并未研究低踏频对关节贡献功率的影响。
本研究旨在调查不同踏频下休闲和精英自行车运动员在低强度和中等强度踏车运动中的关节比功率。
18 名男性自行车运动员(30.9±2.7 岁,乳酸阈时的功频为 282.3±9.3W)在 7 种不同的踏频和 3 种强度下进行踏车运动。通过运动学测量和反动力学从蹬力中计算关节比功率,共在 21 个不同阶段进行。
发现踏频对髋关节、膝关节和踝关节总关节功率的相对关节功率有主要影响(均 P<0.05)。随着踏频增加,膝关节功率增加,髋关节功率降低(均 P<0.05),除了在低踏频(<60rpm)时没有踏频效应。与休闲组相比,精英组的髋关节相对功率更高(P<0.05)。中等强度下自由选择踏频(FCC)时的髋关节功率低于低强度下低踏频(<60rpm)时的髋关节功率(P<0.05)。
本研究表明,踏频对踏车运动中髋关节和膝关节的贡献有影响,但这种影响仅在 60rpm 及以上发生。还表明,精英运动员和休闲运动员的关节贡献存在差异,并提供了通过改变踏频在低强度下获得比中等强度更高的相对髋关节功率的可能性的证据。