University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, Houston, TX.
University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, Houston, TX; Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Departments of Pharmacy and Microbiology, Houston, TX.
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Aug;47(8):963-967. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.12.020. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
Blood culture contamination with gram-positive organisms is a common occurrence in patients suspected of bloodstream infections, especially in emergency departments. Although numerous research studies have investigated the cost implications of blood culture contamination, a contemporary systematic review of the literature has not been performed. The aim of this project was to perform a systematic review of the published literature on the economic costs of blood culture contamination.
PubMed was searched (January 1, 1978, to July 15, 2018) using the search terms "blood culture contamination" or "false-positive blood cultures." Articles were title searched and abstracts were reviewed for eligible articles that reported immediate or downstream economic costs of blood culture contamination.
The PubMed search identified 151 relevant articles by title search, with 49 articles included after abstract review. From the studies included, overall blood culture contamination rates ranged from 0.9%-41%. Up to 59% of patients received unnecessary treatment with parenteral vancomycin as a result of blood culture contamination, resulting in increased pharmacy charges between $210 and $12,611 per patient. Increases in total laboratory charges between $2,397 and $11,152 per patient were reported. Attributable hospital length of stay increases due to blood culture contamination ranged from 1-22 days.
This systematic review of the literature identified several areas of health care expenditure associated with blood culture contamination. Interventions to reduce the risk of blood culture contamination would avoid downstream economic costs.
血培养中革兰阳性菌污染在疑似血流感染患者中很常见,尤其是在急诊科。尽管有大量研究调查了血培养污染的成本影响,但尚未对文献进行当代系统评价。本项目旨在对血培养污染的经济成本的已发表文献进行系统评价。
使用“血培养污染”或“假阳性血培养”等检索词,对 PubMed 进行了检索(1978 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 15 日)。对标题进行搜索,并对摘要进行审查,以筛选出报告血培养污染即时或下游经济成本的合格文章。
通过标题搜索,PubMed 搜索共确定了 151 篇相关文章,经摘要审查后纳入了 49 篇文章。在所纳入的研究中,总体血培养污染率从 0.9%到 41%不等。由于血培养污染,多达 59%的患者接受了不必要的静脉用万古霉素治疗,导致每位患者的药房费用增加了 210 至 12611 美元。报告的总实验室费用增加了每位患者 2397 至 11152 美元。由于血培养污染导致的归因于住院时间的增加范围为 1 至 22 天。
对文献的系统评价确定了与血培养污染相关的几个医疗保健支出领域。减少血培养污染风险的干预措施将避免下游经济成本。