Suppr超能文献

智能手机版视觉模拟评分法和数字评分法评估术后疼痛的效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。

The evaluation of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale as postoperative pain assessment tools: a prospective randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Department of Anesthesia, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;66(6):706-715. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01324-9. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Pain assessment using a novel digital application (Panda) is a smartphone application that contains the digital versions of the visual analogue scale (VAS-100) and numeric rating scale (NRS-11). This study aimed to investigate if the Panda versions of these two pain scales are equivalent to the paper versions in adult patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, cross-over-controlled trial of subjects aged 19-75 yr undergoing procedures with anticipated post-surgical pain. Each subject used both the Panda and paper versions of VAS-100 or NRS-11 pain scores after emergence from anesthesia and after meeting postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge criteria. Correlations between the two tools were analyzed, and Bland-Altman agreement was calculated. The smartphone and paper versions were considered equivalent at each time point if the differences (and their 95% confidence interval [CI]) between them were less than 20 points for the VAS-100 and 2.1 for NRS-11.

RESULTS

The two versions of the VAS-100 correlated strongly after emergence (Pearson's r = 0.93; P < 0.001) and upon meeting discharge criteria (r = 0.94; P < 0.001); the mean (standard deviation [SD]) Panda score after emergence was 35 (27) compared with the paper score of 37 (26) (mean difference, - 2; 95% CI, - 22 to 19). The mean (SD) VAS-100 Panda score upon meeting discharge criteria was 21 (20) compared with the paper score of 23 (21) (mean difference, - 2; 95% CI, - 17 to 13). For the NRS-11, Panda again correlated strongly with the original tool scores after emergence (r = 0.93; P < 0.001) and upon meeting discharge criteria (r = 0.96; P < 0.001); the mean (SD) Panda and paper scores after emergence were both 4 (3) (mean difference, 0.05; 95% CI, - 1.87 to 1.96). The mean (SD) NRS-11 Panda and paper scores upon meeting PACU discharge criteria were both 3 (2) (mean difference, - 0.08; 95% CI, - 1.41 to 1.26).

CONCLUSION

Following emergence from anesthesia in adult patients, the digital Panda version of the NRS-11, but not the VAS-100, is equivalent to the validated paper version. In those who are ready for discharge from the PACU, the digital Panda versions of both the VAS-100 and NRS-11 agreed adequately and can be used in place of the original paper versions.

摘要

目的

使用新型数字应用程序(熊猫)进行疼痛评估是一种包含数字版本视觉模拟量表(VAS-100)和数字评分量表(NRS-11)的智能手机应用程序。本研究旨在调查在成年患者中,这两种疼痛量表的熊猫版本是否与纸质版本等效。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、交叉对照试验,纳入了年龄在 19-75 岁之间、预计术后有疼痛的患者。每位患者在麻醉苏醒后和满足术后恢复室(PACU)出院标准后,分别使用熊猫版和纸质版 VAS-100 或 NRS-11 疼痛评分。分析两种工具之间的相关性,并计算 Bland-Altman 一致性。如果在每个时间点,VAS-100 的差异(及其 95%置信区间 [CI])小于 20 分,NRS-11 的差异小于 2.1 分,则认为智能手机和纸质版本等效。

结果

VAS-100 的两种版本在麻醉苏醒后(Pearson's r = 0.93;P < 0.001)和达到出院标准后(r = 0.94;P < 0.001)相关性很强;麻醉苏醒后熊猫版 VAS-100 的平均(标准差 [SD])评分是 35(27),而纸质版是 37(26)(平均差异,-2;95%CI,-22 至 19)。达到出院标准时,VAS-100 熊猫版的平均(SD)评分是 21(20),而纸质版是 23(21)(平均差异,-2;95%CI,-17 至 13)。对于 NRS-11,熊猫版与原始工具评分在麻醉苏醒后(r = 0.93;P < 0.001)和达到出院标准后(r = 0.96;P < 0.001)也具有很强的相关性;麻醉苏醒后熊猫版和纸质版的平均(SD)评分均为 4(3)(平均差异,0.05;95%CI,-1.87 至 1.96)。达到 PACU 出院标准时,NRS-11 熊猫版和纸质版的平均(SD)评分均为 3(2)(平均差异,-0.08;95%CI,-1.41 至 1.26)。

结论

在成年患者麻醉苏醒后,数字熊猫版 NRS-11 与经过验证的纸质版等效,但 VAS-100 则不然。在准备从 PACU 出院的患者中,VAS-100 和 NRS-11 的数字熊猫版足够一致,可以替代原始的纸质版本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验