Suppr超能文献

长期专项物理治疗对颈肌张力障碍的疗效:一项随机对照试验的结果。

Long-Term Specialized Physical Therapy in Cervical Dystonia: Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1417-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a specialized physical therapy (SPT) program on disability in cervical dystonia (CD) compared to regular physical therapy (RPT).

DESIGN

A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

This study was performed by a physical therapist in a primary health care setting. Measurements were performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months in the botulinum toxin (BoNT) outpatient clinic of the neurology department.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with primary CD and stable on BoNT treatment for 1 year (N=96).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was disability assessed with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). Secondary outcomes were pain, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QOL), and health related costs over 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 72 participants (30 men, 42 women) finished the study: 40 received SPT, 32 RPT. No significant between group differences were found after 12 months of treatment (P=.326). Over these 12 months both groups improved significantly (P<.001) on the TWSTRS disability scale compared to baseline (SPT 1.7 points, RPT 1.0 points). Short Form 36 (SF-36) General Health Perceptions (P=.046) and self-perceived improvement (P=.007) showed significantly larger improvements after 12 months in favor of SPT. Total health related costs after 12 months were $1373±556 for SPT compared to $1614±917 for RPT.

CONCLUSION

SPT revealed no significant differences compared to RPT after 12 months of treatment on the TWSTRS disability scale. Both groups showed similar improvements compared to baseline. Positive results in the SPT group were higher patient perceived effects and general health perception. Treatment costs were lower in the SPT group. With lower costs and similar effects, the SPT program seems to be the preferred program to treat CD.

摘要

目的

评估专门的物理疗法(SPT)方案对颈肌张力障碍(CD)患者残疾的疗效,与常规物理疗法(RPT)相比。

设计

单盲随机对照试验。

地点

本研究由一名物理治疗师在初级保健环境中进行。在神经科肉毒毒素(BoNT)门诊,于基线、6 个月和 12 个月时进行测量。

参与者

接受 BoNT 治疗稳定 1 年的原发性 CD 患者(N=96)。

主要观察指标

主要结局是使用多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS)评估残疾情况。次要结局是疼痛、焦虑、抑郁、生活质量(QOL)和 12 个月内的健康相关费用。

结果

共有 72 名参与者(30 名男性,42 名女性)完成了研究:40 名接受 SPT,32 名接受 RPT。治疗 12 个月后,两组间无显著差异(P=.326)。与基线相比,两组在 TWSTRS 残疾量表上在 12 个月内均显著改善(P<.001)(SPT 1.7 分,RPT 1.0 分)。在 12 个月时,36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)一般健康认知(P=.046)和自我感知改善(P=.007)显示 SPT 组的改善更为显著。治疗 12 个月后,SPT 的总健康相关费用为 1373±556 美元,而 RPT 为 1614±917 美元。

结论

治疗 12 个月后,TWSTRS 残疾量表上 SPT 与 RPT 相比无显著差异。两组与基线相比均有相似的改善。SPT 组的积极结果是更高的患者感知效果和一般健康认知。SPT 组的治疗费用较低。SPT 方案的成本较低,效果相似,似乎是治疗 CD 的首选方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验