Lopez Ramos Christian, Rennert Robert C, Brandel Michael G, Abraham Peter, Hirshman Brian R, Steinberg Jeffrey A, Santiago-Dieppa David R, Wali Arvin R, Porras Kevin, Almosa Yazeed, Pannell Jeffrey S, Khalessi Alexander A
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 22;132(3):788-796. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS18103. Print 2020 Mar 1.
Safety-net hospitals deliver care to a substantial share of vulnerable patient populations and are disproportionately impacted by hospital payment reform policies. Complex elective procedures performed at safety-net facilities are associated with worse outcomes and higher costs. The effects of hospital safety-net burden on highly specialized, emergent, and resource-intensive conditions are poorly understood. The authors examined the effects of hospital safety-net burden on outcomes and costs after emergent neurosurgical intervention for ruptured cerebral aneurysms.
The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2002 to 2011. Patients ≥ 18 years old who underwent emergent surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were included. Safety-net burden was defined as the proportion of Medicaid and uninsured patients treated at each hospital included in the NIS database. Hospitals that performed clipping and coiling were stratified as low-burden (LBH), medium-burden (MBH), and high-burden (HBH) hospitals.
A total of 34,647 patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms underwent clipping and 23,687 underwent coiling. Compared to LBHs, HBHs were more likely to treat black, Hispanic, Medicaid, and uninsured patients (p < 0.001). HBHs were also more likely to be associated with teaching hospitals (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed among the burden groups in the severity of subarachnoid hemorrhage. After adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, treatment at an HBH did not predict in-hospital mortality, poor outcome, length of stay, costs, or likelihood of a hospital-acquired condition.
Despite their financial burden, safety-net hospitals provide equitable care after surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for ruptured cerebral aneurysms and do not incur higher hospital costs. Safety-net hospitals may have the capacity to provide equitable surgical care for highly specialized emergent neurosurgical conditions.
安全网医院为相当一部分弱势患者群体提供医疗服务,且受医院支付改革政策的影响尤为严重。在安全网机构进行的复杂择期手术与更差的治疗结果和更高的成本相关。医院安全网负担对高度专业化、紧急和资源密集型病症的影响尚不清楚。作者研究了医院安全网负担对破裂脑动脉瘤紧急神经外科干预后治疗结果和成本的影响。
作者对2002年至2011年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)进行了回顾性分析。纳入年龄≥18岁、因动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)接受紧急手术夹闭和血管内栓塞治疗的患者。安全网负担定义为NIS数据库中每家医院治疗的医疗补助患者和未参保患者的比例。进行夹闭和栓塞治疗的医院被分为低负担(LBH)、中等负担(MBH)和高负担(HBH)医院。
共有34,647例破裂脑动脉瘤患者接受了夹闭治疗,23,687例接受了栓塞治疗。与低负担医院相比,高负担医院更有可能治疗黑人、西班牙裔、医疗补助患者和未参保患者(p<0.001)。高负担医院也更有可能与教学医院相关(p<0.001)。在蛛网膜下腔出血的严重程度方面,各负担组之间未观察到显著差异。在调整患者人口统计学和医院特征后,在高负担医院接受治疗并不能预测住院死亡率、不良结局、住院时间、成本或医院获得性疾病的可能性。
尽管存在经济负担,但安全网医院在为破裂脑动脉瘤进行手术夹闭和血管内栓塞治疗后提供了公平的医疗服务,且不会产生更高的医院成本。安全网医院可能有能力为高度专业化的紧急神经外科病症提供公平的手术治疗。