Suppr超能文献

比较 2013 年和 2017 年基线特征,治疗寻求的使用阿片类药物与共病的患者。

A comparison of 2013 and 2017 baseline characteristics among treatment-seeking patients who used opioids with co-occurring disorders.

机构信息

School of Social Work, Georgia State University, 55 Park Place, Rm. 575, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States of America.

Universal Health Services, Inc., 1000 Health Park Drive, Building 3, Suite 400, Brentwood, TN 37027, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Apr;99:134-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.023. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

Abstract

The opioid epidemic is a public health crisis that has captured the attention of the media and political leaders, but how much do we know about its implications for substance use disorder treatment providers? This study is the first to investigate the differing baseline characteristics among patients with co-occurring disorders who used opioids and entered residential treatment in 2013 and 2017. Our sample consisted of 1413 unique adults who reported using opioids upon admission to integrated residential treatment for co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders during 2013 (n = 718) and 2017 (n = 695). Opioid use was defined as self-reported use of heroin or illicit use of prescription opioids, including methadone, during the month prior to admission into the treatment program. All study participants completed an admission interview that included the Addiction Severity Index (ASI). The 2017 cohort demonstrated higher severity than the 2013 cohort on the employment, psychiatric, and alcohol and drug ASI composite scores. A comparison of days per month that the cohorts used various substances also reveals this trend, with the following comparisons listing the 2017 cohort data first, and the 2013 cohort data second: (1) alcohol (8.6 days vs. 7.0 days); (2) cocaine (4.1 days vs. 2.2 days); (3) amphetamines (6.2 days vs. 3.6 days); and (4) polysubstance use in one day (16.6 days vs. 11.6 days). The 2017 cohort was also intoxicated from alcohol more days per month (7.2 days vs. 5.1 days). However, the 2017 cohort reported fewer days using prescription opioids (9.9 days vs. 12.4 days). A higher proportion of the 2017 cohort reported (1) depression (74% vs. 68%); (2) anxiety (88% vs. 84%); (3) hallucinations (14% vs 8%); and (4) and suicidal ideation (22% vs. 17%).

摘要

阿片类药物泛滥是一场公共卫生危机,已经引起了媒体和政治领导人的关注,但我们对其对物质使用障碍治疗提供者的影响了解多少?这项研究首次调查了 2013 年和 2017 年同时患有物质使用障碍和精神健康障碍并接受住院治疗的患者中,同时使用阿片类药物的患者的不同基线特征。我们的样本包括 1413 名在 2013 年(n=718)和 2017 年(n=695)进入同时患有物质使用障碍和精神健康障碍的综合住院治疗项目时报告使用阿片类药物的独特成年人。阿片类药物的使用定义为在进入治疗项目前一个月内自我报告使用海洛因或非法使用处方类阿片类药物,包括美沙酮。所有研究参与者完成了一项入院访谈,其中包括成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)。2017 年队列在就业、精神病学和酒精及药物 ASI 综合评分方面的严重程度均高于 2013 年队列。对两个队列每月使用各种物质的天数进行比较也显示出这种趋势,以下比较列出了 2017 年队列的数据,然后列出了 2013 年队列的数据:(1)酒精(8.6 天 vs. 7.0 天);(2)可卡因(4.1 天 vs. 2.2 天);(3)苯丙胺(6.2 天 vs. 3.6 天);(4)单日多物质使用(16.6 天 vs. 11.6 天)。2017 年队列每月因酒精而中毒的天数也更多(7.2 天 vs. 5.1 天)。然而,2017 年队列报告的使用处方类阿片类药物的天数更少(9.9 天 vs. 12.4 天)。2017 年队列报告的(1)抑郁(74% vs. 68%);(2)焦虑(88% vs. 84%);(3)幻觉(14% vs. 8%);(4)自杀意念(22% vs. 17%)的比例更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验