Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, Italy.
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sensory Organs, University of Bari, Italy.
Injury. 2019 Jul;50 Suppl 2:S89-S94. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.052. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
The purpose of this systematic review was to address the treatment of multiligament knee injuries in three major aspects, specifically (1) surgical versus nonoperative treatment, (2) repair versus reconstruction of injured ligamentous structures, and (3) early versus late surgery of damaged ligaments.
Two independent reviewers performed a search on PubMed from 1966 to March 2016 using Levy's review as a starting-point, and the same terms "knee dislocation," "multiple ligament-injured knee," and "multiligament knee reconstruction." Study inclusion criteria were (1) levels I to IV evidence, (2) "multiligament" defined as disruption of at least 2 of the 4 major knee ligaments, (3) measures of functional and clinical outcomes, and (4) minimum of 12 months' follow-up, with a mean of at least 24 months.
Two high-level studies compared surgical treatment with nonoperative treatment. There was a higher Lyshom scores (85 v 67) in surgically treated patients, as well as higher excellent/good IKDC scores (69% v 64%) and return to sport (41% v 18%). There were four studies comparing repair with reconstruction of damaged structures, with similar mean Lysholm scores (84 v 84) and excellent/good IKDC scores (63% v 63%). Nevertheless, repair of the posterolateral corner had a higher failure rate (39% v 8%) and a lower return to sport activities (25% v 51%). Similarly, repair of the cruciates achieved decreased stability and range of motion. There were six studies comparing early surgery (within 3 weeks) with delayed surgery. Early treatment resulted in higher mean Lysholm scores (89 v 82) and a higher percentage of excellent/good IKDC scores (57% v 41%), as well as higher mean ROM (129° v 124°).
Our review suggests that the best treatment does not exist, but better functional and clinical outcomes have been achieved with reconstruction rather than repair. Surgery must be performed within the first three weeks. Delayed ACL reconstruction allows to reduce arthrofibrosis rate.
本系统回顾旨在从三个主要方面探讨多韧带膝关节损伤的治疗方法,具体为(1)手术与非手术治疗,(2)损伤韧带结构的修复与重建,以及(3)损伤韧带的早期与晚期手术。
两名独立评审员于 2016 年 3 月前在 PubMed 上进行了检索,以 Levy 的综述为起点,并使用相同的术语“膝关节脱位”、“多韧带损伤膝关节”和“多韧带膝关节重建”。研究纳入标准为(1)I 至 IV 级证据,(2)“多韧带”定义为至少 2 条 4 大主要膝关节韧带断裂,(3)功能和临床结果测量,以及(4)至少 12 个月的随访,平均随访时间至少 24 个月。
两项高级别研究比较了手术治疗与非手术治疗。手术治疗患者 Lyshom 评分较高(85 分比 67 分),IKDC 优秀/良好评分较高(69%比 64%),重返运动比例较高(41%比 18%)。四项研究比较了损伤结构的修复与重建,平均 Lysholm 评分相似(84 分比 84 分),IKDC 优秀/良好评分相似(63%比 63%)。然而,后外侧角的修复失败率较高(39%比 8%),重返运动活动比例较低(25%比 51%)。同样,交叉韧带的修复导致稳定性和活动范围降低。六项研究比较了早期手术(3 周内)与延迟手术。早期治疗的 Lysholm 评分较高(89 分比 82 分),IKDC 优秀/良好评分比例较高(57%比 41%),平均 ROM 较高(129°比 124°)。
我们的综述表明,不存在最佳治疗方法,但重建比修复能获得更好的功能和临床结果。手术必须在最初的 3 周内进行。延迟 ACL 重建可降低关节纤维化发生率。