• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科就诊后急性疼痛缓解情况:14 天轨迹分析。

Acute Pain Resolution After an Emergency Department Visit: A 14-Day Trajectory Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Research Centre, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal (CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île de-Montréal), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d'Urgence, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Research Centre, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal (CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île de-Montréal), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.019
PMID:30797575
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to evaluate the acute pain intensity evolution in emergency department (ED) discharged patients, using group-based trajectory modeling. This method identifies patient groups with similar profiles of change over time without assuming the existence of a particular pattern or number of groups.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients aged 18 years or older, with an acute pain condition (≤2 weeks), and discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary assessing daily pain intensity level (numeric rating scale of 0 to 10) and pain medication use.

RESULTS

Among the 372 included patients, 6 distinct post-ED pain intensity trajectories were identified. Two started with severe levels of pain; one remained with severe pain intensity (12.6% of the sample) and the other ended with a moderate pain intensity level (26.3%). Two other trajectories had severe initial pain; one decreased to mild pain (21.7%) and the other to no pain (13.8%). Another trajectory had moderate initial pain that decreased to a mild level (15.9%) and the last one started with mild pain intensity and had no pain at the end of the 14-day period (9.7%). The pain trajectory patterns were significantly associated with age, type of painful conditions, pain intensity at ED discharge, and opioid consumption.

CONCLUSION

Acute pain resolution after an ED visit seems to progress through 6 different trajectory patterns that are more informative than simple linear models and could be useful to adapt acute pain management in future research.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在使用基于群组的轨迹建模评估急诊科(ED)出院患者的急性疼痛强度演变。该方法可识别具有相似时间变化特征的患者群组,而无需假设存在特定模式或群组数量。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入年龄在 18 岁及以上、有急性疼痛(≤2 周)且携带阿片类药物处方出院的 ED 患者。患者完成了为期 14 天的日记,评估每日疼痛强度水平(0 至 10 的数字评分量表)和疼痛药物使用情况。

结果

在 372 名纳入患者中,确定了 6 种不同的 ED 后疼痛强度轨迹。其中 2 种起始时疼痛程度严重;1 种持续存在严重疼痛强度(占样本的 12.6%),另 1 种结束时疼痛强度为中度(26.3%)。另外 2 种轨迹起始时疼痛严重,1 种降至轻度疼痛(21.7%),另 1 种降至无痛(13.8%)。另一种轨迹起始时疼痛中度,降至轻度(15.9%),最后一种起始时疼痛轻度,14 天结束时无痛(9.7%)。疼痛轨迹模式与年龄、疼痛类型、ED 出院时的疼痛强度和阿片类药物消耗显著相关。

结论

ED 就诊后急性疼痛的缓解似乎通过 6 种不同的轨迹模式进展,这些模式比简单的线性模型更具信息性,并且可能有助于在未来的研究中调整急性疼痛管理。

相似文献

1
Acute Pain Resolution After an Emergency Department Visit: A 14-Day Trajectory Analysis.急诊科就诊后急性疼痛缓解情况:14 天轨迹分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
Relationship between acute pain trajectories after an emergency department visit and chronic pain: a Canadian prospective cohort study.急诊科就诊后急性疼痛轨迹与慢性疼痛的关系:一项加拿大前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e040390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040390.
3
Opioid and non-opioid pain relief after an emergency department acute pain visit.急诊科急性疼痛就诊后的阿片类和非阿片类疼痛缓解。
CJEM. 2021 May;23(3):342-350. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00041-3. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Quantity of opioids consumed following an emergency department visit for acute pain: a Canadian prospective cohort study.急诊科急性疼痛就诊后阿片类药物的使用量:一项加拿大前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 17;8(9):e022649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022649.
5
Accuracy of a self-report prescription opioid use diary for patients discharge from the emergency department with acute pain: a multicentre prospective cohort study.自我报告处方阿片类药物使用日记对急诊急性疼痛患者出院后准确性的研究:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 28;12(10):e062984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062984.
6
Association between fentanyl treatment for acute pain in the emergency department and opioid use two weeks after discharge.急诊科急性疼痛芬太尼治疗与出院后两周内阿片类药物使用的关联。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;52:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.041. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
7
In-hospital opioid consumption, but not pain intensity scores, predicts 6-month levels of pain catastrophizing following hepatic resection: A trajectory analysis.住院期间阿片类药物的使用量而非疼痛强度评分可预测肝切除术后 6 个月的疼痛灾难化水平:轨迹分析。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Mar;23(3):503-514. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1324. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
Opioid Use and Misuse Three Months After Emergency Department Visit for Acute Pain.急诊就诊急性疼痛后三个月的阿片类药物使用和滥用情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;26(8):847-855. doi: 10.1111/acem.13628. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
Opioid prescription practices at discharge and 30-day returns in children with sickle cell disease and pain.镰状细胞病伴疼痛患儿出院时的阿片类药物处方做法及30天回访情况。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 May;64(5). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26319. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Sufentanil sublingual tablet 30mcg for moderate-to-severe acute pain in the ED.舒芬太尼舌下片 30μg 用于急诊科中重度急性疼痛。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):954-961. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.058. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prospective Cohort Study to Determine Which Opioid-Naïve Emergency Department Patients Are at Risk of Persistent Opioid Use.一项前瞻性队列研究,以确定哪些初次使用阿片类药物的急诊科患者有持续使用阿片类药物的风险。
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Aug;86(2):179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.02.025. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
2
Impact of vitamin C on the reduction of opioid consumption for acute musculoskeletal pain: A double-blind randomized control pilot study.维生素C对减少急性肌肉骨骼疼痛阿片类药物用量的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0316450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316450. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of vitamin C on the reduction of opioid consumption after an emergency department visit for acute musculoskeletal pain: a double-blind randomised control trial protocol.
维生素 C 对急诊科急性肌肉骨骼疼痛就诊后减少阿片类药物消耗的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 24;13(5):e069230. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069230.
4
Willingness to use nonpharmacologic treatments for musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department: a cross-sectional study.急诊科对肌肉骨骼疼痛采用非药物治疗的意愿:一项横断面研究。
Pain Rep. 2022 Aug 17;7(5):e1027. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001027. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
5
Opioid and non-opioid pain relief after an emergency department acute pain visit.急诊科急性疼痛就诊后的阿片类和非阿片类疼痛缓解。
CJEM. 2021 May;23(3):342-350. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00041-3. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
6
AAAPT: Assessment of the Acute Pain Trajectory.AAAPT:急性疼痛轨迹评估。
Pain Med. 2021 Mar 18;22(3):533-547. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa440.
7
Relationship between acute pain trajectories after an emergency department visit and chronic pain: a Canadian prospective cohort study.急诊科就诊后急性疼痛轨迹与慢性疼痛的关系:一项加拿大前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e040390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040390.
8
Thoughts on the 2019 American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement on chronic opioid therapy and sleep.关于 2019 年美国睡眠医学学会关于慢性阿片类药物治疗与睡眠的立场声明的思考。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 May 15;16(5):831-833. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8368. Epub 2020 Feb 13.