Suppr超能文献

解剖预塑形锁定钢板与重建钢板治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折功能预后的比较分析

Comparative analysis of functional outcome of anatomical precontoured locking plate versus reconstruction plate in the management of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.

作者信息

Kingsly P, Sathish M, Ismail N Deen Muhammad

机构信息

Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Park Town, Chennai.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499018820351. doi: 10.1177/2309499018820351.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For the fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures, different plates are available, each with its specific pros and cons. The ideal plating choice remains subject to ongoing discussion. Reconstruction plates are cheap and easily bendable, but their strength and stability have been questioned. The anatomical precontoured locking plates provide better stability and strength compared with the reconstruction plate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have analyzed both prospectively and retrospectively 55 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated surgically using precontoured anatomical locking plate (24 cases) or reconstruction plate (31 cases) for patients admitted in our institute between January 2011 and December 2017. The clinical and radiological outcomes between the reconstruction plate and precontoured anatomical locking plate were compared using Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and plain radiographs, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean time to union was 16.3 weeks in the reconstruction plate group compared with 13.4 weeks in the precontoured locking plate group. The mean score in Quick DASH was 32.65 in the reconstruction group and 25.44 points in the precontoured locking plate group. We had complications such as hypertrophic scar, painful shoulder, and restricted range of motion in both the groups, whereas screw cutout and plate failure were noted only in the reconstruction plate group, which needed implant removal. The mean follow-up period was 16.44 months (14-31 months). The removal of implant was carried out in three patients in the reconstruction group. None of the group had nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Surgical management of fresh middle third clavicle fractures with anatomical precontoured locking plate provided stable fixation, faster union, and better functional outcome compared with the reconstruction plating. Anatomical plate had the advantage of less soft tissue stripping, and there is less need for lag screw fixation of the plate for fracture stability as precontoured plate itself provides a rigid construct.

摘要

引言

对于移位的锁骨中段骨折的固定,有不同的钢板可供选择,每种都有其特定的优缺点。理想的钢板选择仍在不断讨论中。重建钢板价格便宜且易于弯曲,但其强度和稳定性受到质疑。与重建钢板相比,解剖型预塑形锁定钢板提供了更好的稳定性和强度。

材料与方法

我们对2011年1月至2017年12月在我院住院的55例移位的锁骨中段骨折患者进行了前瞻性和回顾性分析,这些患者分别采用预塑形解剖锁定钢板(24例)或重建钢板(31例)进行手术治疗。分别使用手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评定量表(DASH)评分和X线平片比较重建钢板组和预塑形解剖锁定钢板组的临床和影像学结果。

结果

重建钢板组的平均愈合时间为16.3周,而预塑形锁定钢板组为13.4周。重建组的DASH平均评分为32.65分,预塑形锁定钢板组为25.44分。两组均出现了如增生性瘢痕、肩部疼痛和活动范围受限等并发症,而仅在重建钢板组出现了螺钉穿出和钢板断裂,需要取出植入物。平均随访期为16.44个月(14 - 31个月)。重建组有3例患者取出了植入物。两组均无骨不连。

结论

与重建钢板内固定相比,采用解剖型预塑形锁定钢板对新鲜的锁骨中1/3骨折进行手术治疗可提供稳定的固定、更快的愈合和更好的功能结果。解剖钢板具有软组织剥离少的优点,并且由于预塑形钢板本身提供了坚固的结构,因此对钢板进行拉力螺钉固定以维持骨折稳定性的需求较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验