• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sebia游离轻链分析与Freelite分析在多发性骨髓瘤诊断、反应及复发评估临床管理中的比较

Comparison of Sebia Free Light Chain Assay With Freelite Assay for the Clinical Management of Diagnosis, Response, and Relapse Assessment in Multiple Myeloma.

作者信息

Caillon Hélène, Avet-Loiseau Hervé, Attal Michel, Moreau Philippe, Decaux Olivier, Dejoie Thomas

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.

Unity of Genomics in Myeloma, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 May;19(5):e228-e237. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2019.01.007
PMID:30799237
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serum free light chain (FLC) measurement has become an important marker for the management of multiple myeloma (MM). However, several analytical challenges remain unresolved. We compared the clinical performances of the Sebia FLC assay in MM to the Freelite assay.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 177 patients from the IFM DFCI 2009 trial were enrolled onto this study, with a total of 368 samples analyzed. At baseline, concordance of the involved to noninvolved FLC ratio (iFLC/niFLC) was evaluated. During therapy, comparison of the disease response assessments according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria was performed.

RESULTS

Compared to Freelite, the Sebia FLC assay demonstrated lower results, with a proportional bias with increased values. We demonstrated that the Sebia equivalent of the iFLC/niFLC ratio of 100 was 16. During follow-up, agreement in response assessment was moderate (for light chains MM) to good (for intact immunoglobulin MM). In the context of relapse, the concordance was moderate, but longitudinal follow-up showed a similar kinetics.

CONCLUSION

The Sebia FLC assay provides inequivalent absolute results from the Freelite assay. Despite lower absolute FLC values, the kinetics of response and relapse is exactly the same. As with other FLC assays available, follow-up of MM with the same method is advisable.

摘要

背景

血清游离轻链(FLC)检测已成为多发性骨髓瘤(MM)管理的一项重要标志物。然而,一些分析挑战仍未得到解决。我们将塞比亚FLC检测在MM中的临床性能与弗里莱特检测进行了比较。

患者与方法

IFM DFCI 2009试验中的177例患者被纳入本研究,共分析了368份样本。在基线时,评估受累与未受累FLC比值(iFLC/niFLC)的一致性。在治疗期间,根据国际骨髓瘤工作组标准对疾病反应评估进行比较。

结果

与弗里莱特检测相比,塞比亚FLC检测结果较低,且随着数值增加存在比例偏差。我们证明塞比亚检测中iFLC/niFLC比值为100时,其等效值为16。在随访期间,反应评估的一致性在轻链型MM中为中等(程度),在完整免疫球蛋白型MM中为良好。在复发情况下,一致性为中等,但纵向随访显示出相似的动力学变化。

结论

塞比亚FLC检测提供的绝对结果与弗里莱特检测不等效。尽管绝对FLC值较低,但反应和复发的动力学变化完全相同。与其他可用的FLC检测一样,建议采用相同方法对MM进行随访。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Sebia Free Light Chain Assay With Freelite Assay for the Clinical Management of Diagnosis, Response, and Relapse Assessment in Multiple Myeloma.Sebia游离轻链分析与Freelite分析在多发性骨髓瘤诊断、反应及复发评估临床管理中的比较
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 May;19(5):e228-e237. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
2
Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays-implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma.三种不同的无血清轻链检测方法的比较——对多发性骨髓瘤的诊断和治疗监测的影响。
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0267-8.
3
Evaluation of the new Sebia free light chain assay using the AP22 ELITE instrument.评估使用 AP22 ELITE 仪器的新 Sebia 游离轻链检测法。
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Dec;487:161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.09.030. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
4
[Serum free light chains for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma].[血清游离轻链用于多发性骨髓瘤的诊断及随访]
Korean J Lab Med. 2008 Jun;28(3):169-73. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2008.28.3.169.
5
The tumor kinetics of multiple myeloma following autologous stem cell transplantation as assessed by measuring serum-free light chains.通过检测血清游离轻链评估自体干细胞移植后多发性骨髓瘤的肿瘤动力学。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2006 Jan;47(1):21-8. doi: 10.1080/10428190500254216.
6
Evaluation of a new free light chain ELISA assay: bringing coherence with electrophoretic methods.评估一种新的游离轻链 ELISA 检测法:与电泳方法保持一致。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Jan 26;56(2):312-322. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0339.
7
Clinical specificity of two assays for immunoglobulin kappa and lambda free light chains.两种免疫球蛋白 κ 和 λ 游离轻链检测方法的临床特异性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Dec 5;62(5):929-938. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0912. Print 2024 Apr 25.
8
Inter-assay variability in automated serum free light chain assays and their use in the clinical laboratory.自动化血清游离轻链检测中的分析内变异及其在临床实验室中的应用。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020 Mar;57(2):73-85. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1670133. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
9
[Analysis of the relationship of heavy/light chain pairs of immunoglobulin (Hevylite) to the results of gel electrophoresis and nefelometric examination of serum proteins at the time of multiple myeloma diagnosis].[多发性骨髓瘤诊断时免疫球蛋白重链/轻链对(Hevylite)与血清蛋白凝胶电泳及散射比浊检测结果的关系分析]
Cas Lek Cesk. 2015;154(6):292-302.
10
Development of a rapid and quantitative lateral flow assay for the simultaneous measurement of serum κ and λ immunoglobulin free light chains (FLC): inception of a new near-patient FLC screening tool.开发一种快速定量的侧向流动测定法,用于同时测量血清κ和λ免疫球蛋白游离轻链(FLC):一种新的床边 FLC 筛选工具的诞生。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):424-434. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0194.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance and comparison of FLCCheck: a novel serum free light chain assay for the Auxiliary Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma.FLCCheck的性能与比较:一种用于多发性骨髓瘤辅助诊断的新型血清游离轻链检测方法
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 4;30(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02984-8.
2
Performance Characteristics and Limitations of the Available Assays for the Detection and Quantitation of Monoclonal Free Light Chains and New Emerging Methodologies.用于检测和定量单克隆游离轻链的现有检测方法的性能特征与局限性以及新兴方法
Antibodies (Basel). 2024 Mar 11;13(1):19. doi: 10.3390/antib13010019.
3
Evaluation of a new ELISA assay for monoclonal free-light chain detection in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.
一种用于检测心脏淀粉样变性患者单克隆游离轻链的新型酶联免疫吸附测定法的评估
EJHaem. 2022 Jun 24;3(3):828-837. doi: 10.1002/jha2.516. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
How to quantify monoclonal free light chains in plasma cell disorders: which mass spectrometry technology?如何定量检测浆细胞疾病中的单克隆游离轻链:哪种质谱技术?
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Aug;8(15):973. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.200.
5
Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays-implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma.三种不同的无血清轻链检测方法的比较——对多发性骨髓瘤的诊断和治疗监测的影响。
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0267-8.