• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期胰腺腺癌真的早期吗:手术优先与新辅助治疗序贯治疗后最终病理分期迁移。

Is early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma truly early: stage migration on final pathology with surgery-first versus neoadjuvant therapy sequencing.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2019 Sep;21(9):1203-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.011
PMID:30799277
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) remains controversial in early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), defined as clinical (c)Stage I-II. Our aim was to analyze rates of pathologic upstaging/downstaging for resectable PDAC treated with surgery-first (SF) vs. NT.

METHODS

Utilizing the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), patients with cStage I-II PDAC who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in 2006-2013 were pathologically staged using the AJCC 8th edition and compared by treatment sequencing.

RESULTS

Among 13,871 patients, 15.3% received NT. Despite higher pre-treatment T-stage (cT2: 71.9% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.001), NT patients had lower rates of pathologic nodal metastases (46.2% vs. 69.2% in SF, p < 0.001), suggesting higher rates of pathologic downstaging. In cStage II, 33.0% were upstaged to stage III after SF, vs. only 14.0% after NT. In cStage I, 65.5% were upstaged following SF, vs. 46.7% after NT (all p < 0.001). Patients with NT (HR-0.77, p < 0.001) or downstaging (HR-0.80, p < 0.001) had improved overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSION

NT is associated with reduction in unexpected upstaging, reduction in nodal positivity, and improved OS, compared to SF approach in putatively early-stage PDAC. Because clinical staging underestimates the underlying disease burden in resectable PDAC, patients with cStage I-II should be considered for NT.

摘要

背景

新辅助治疗(NT)在早期胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中仍存在争议,定义为临床(c)I-II 期。我们的目的是分析接受手术优先(SF)与 NT 治疗的可切除 PDAC 的病理升级/降级率。

方法

利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB),对 2006-2013 年间接受胰十二指肠切除术的 cI-II 期 PDAC 患者进行病理分期,采用第 8 版 AJCC 分期,并按治疗顺序进行比较。

结果

在 13871 名患者中,15.3%接受了 NT。尽管术前 T 分期更高(cT2:71.9%比 56.3%,p<0.001),但 NT 患者的病理淋巴结转移率较低(SF 组为 46.2%,比 SF 组为 69.2%,p<0.001),提示病理降级率较高。在 c 期 II 期,33.0%在 SF 后升级为 III 期,而 NT 后仅为 14.0%。在 c 期 I 期,65.5%在 SF 后升级,而 NT 后为 46.7%(均 p<0.001)。接受 NT(HR-0.77,p<0.001)或降级(HR-0.80,p<0.001)的患者总生存率(OS)改善。

结论

与 SF 方法相比,NT 可降低意外升级率、降低淋巴结阳性率,并改善 OS,用于治疗潜在的早期 PDAC。由于临床分期低估了可切除 PDAC 患者的潜在疾病负担,因此应考虑对 cI-II 期患者进行 NT。

相似文献

1
Is early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma truly early: stage migration on final pathology with surgery-first versus neoadjuvant therapy sequencing.早期胰腺腺癌真的早期吗:手术优先与新辅助治疗序贯治疗后最终病理分期迁移。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Sep;21(9):1203-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
2
AJCC 8th edition pathologic nodal staging of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma predicts survival regardless of treatment sequencing.AJCC 第 8 版切除胰腺腺癌的病理淋巴结分期可预测生存,与治疗顺序无关。
Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;40:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101673. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma depends on response to neoadjuvant therapy.胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺腺癌后的辅助化疗的益处取决于新辅助治疗的反应。
J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;130(1):109-116. doi: 10.1002/jso.27689. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.采用 AJCC 第 8 版 T 分期标准的大体肿瘤大小不能为新辅助治疗的胰腺导管腺癌提供预后分层。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020 Jun;46:151485. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151485. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Elevation in Anatomically Resectable, Early Stage Pancreatic Cancer Is Independently Associated with Decreased Overall Survival and an Indication for Neoadjuvant Therapy: A National Cancer Database Study.可解剖切除的早期胰腺癌中糖类抗原19-9升高与总生存期降低独立相关且是新辅助治疗的指征:一项国家癌症数据库研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jul;223(1):52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Equipping the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with tumor grade: a recursive partitioning analysis.为美国癌症联合委员会可切除胰腺导管腺癌分期配备肿瘤分级:递归划分分析
Med Oncol. 2016 Nov;33(11):122. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0839-4. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
7
The Addition of Postoperative Chemotherapy is Associated with Improved Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Preoperative Therapy.在接受术前治疗的胰腺癌患者中,术后化疗的加入与生存率提高相关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1221-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4854-z. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
8
White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part I, AJCC staging system, NCCN guidelines, and borderline resectable disease.美国腹部放射学会胰腺导管腺癌疾病聚焦专家组关于胰腺导管腺癌的白皮书:第一部分,AJCC 分期系统、NCCN 指南和交界可切除疾病。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Mar;45(3):716-728. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02289-5.
9
Predictors of Resectability and Survival in Patients With Borderline and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment With FOLFIRINOX.FOLFIRINOX 新辅助治疗后可切除性和生存预测因素分析:交界性和局部进展期胰腺癌患者
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):733-740. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002600.
10
The Impact of Tumor Location on Resection and Survival for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.肿瘤位置对胰腺导管腺癌切除和生存的影响。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jul;239:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.061. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment on Overall Survival Among Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: National Cancer Database Analysis.新辅助治疗后肿瘤反应对胰腺导管腺癌患者总生存期的影响:美国国立癌症数据库分析
Cureus. 2024 Nov 12;16(11):e73524. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73524. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: potential diagnostic and prognostic significance in clinical practice.胰腺导管腺癌循环肿瘤细胞的分子特征:临床实践中的潜在诊断和预后意义。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2021 Dec;10(6):796-810. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-20-383.
3
Perception versus reality: A National Cohort Analysis of the surgery-first approach for resectable pancreatic cancer.
看法与现实:可切除胰腺癌的手术优先方法的全国队列分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Sep;10(17):5925-5935. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4144. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
4
Current controversies and advances in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.胰腺腺癌治疗中的当前争议与进展
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):472-494. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i6.472.
5
ASO Author Reflections: Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Survival After Margin-Positive Resection for Pancreatic Cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7770-7771. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10177-w. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Survival Following Margin-Positive Resection for Pancreatic Cancer.新辅助治疗对胰腺癌切缘阳性患者生存的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7759-7769. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10175-y. Epub 2021 May 23.
7
Is Neoadjuvant Treatment Justified in Clinical T1 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?新辅助治疗在临床T1期胰腺导管腺癌中是否合理?
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 20;10(4):873. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040873.
8
What Should Guide the Performance of Venous Resection During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Venous Contact?胰头十二指肠切除术治疗胰管腺癌伴静脉受侵时应如何指导静脉切除?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6211-6222. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09568-2. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
9
Biliary intervention rates during neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.新辅助治疗胰头腺癌期间的胆道介入治疗率。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Aug;23(8):1196-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.11.1147. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
10
Evaluation of Pathologic Response on Overall Survival After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.新辅助治疗后胰腺导管腺癌患者总生存的病理反应评估。
Pancreas. 2020 Aug;49(7):897-903. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001590.