School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University.
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Clin J Pain. 2019 May;35(5):435-442. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000696.
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and manipulation-induced analgesia (MIA) may activate similar neurophysiological mechanisms to mediate their analgesic effects. This study assessed the association between CPM and MIA responses in people with lateral epicondylalgia.
Seventy participants with lateral epicondylalgia were assessed for CPM followed by MIA. A single assessor measured pressure pain thresholds (PPT) before, during, and after cold water immersion (10°C) of the asymptomatic hand and contralateral lateral glide (CLG) mobilization of the neck. For analyses, linear mixed models evaluated differences in CPM and MIA responses. Pearson partial correlations and regression analyses evaluated the association between CPM and MIA PPT.
There was a significant increase (CPM and MIA, P<0.001) in PPT from baseline during the interventions (CPM mean: 195.84 kPa for elbow and 201.87 kPa for wrist, MIA mean: 123.01 kPa for elbow and 126.06 kPa for wrist) and after the interventions (CPM mean: 126.06 kPa for elbow, 114.24 kPa for wrist, MIA mean: 123.50 kPa for elbow and 122.16 kPa for wrist). There were also significant moderate and positive partial linear correlations (r: 0.40 to 0.54, P<0.001) between CPM and MIA measures, controlling for baseline measures. Regression analyses showed that CPM PPT was a significant predictor of MIA PPT (P<0.001) and the models explained between 73% and 85% of the variance in MIA PPT.
This study showed that CPM and MIA responses were significantly correlated and that the CPM response was a significant predictor of MIA response.
条件性疼痛调制(CPM)和操作诱导镇痛(MIA)可能通过激活相似的神经生理机制来介导其镇痛作用。本研究评估了外侧肱骨上髁炎患者的 CPM 和 MIA 反应之间的相关性。
70 名外侧肱骨上髁炎患者接受了 CPM 评估,然后接受了 MIA 评估。一名单一评估者在无症状手冷水浸泡(10°C)和对侧颈部侧向滑动(CLG)移动期间和之后测量压力疼痛阈值(PPT)。为了分析,线性混合模型评估了 CPM 和 MIA 反应的差异。Pearson 偏相关和回归分析评估了 CPM 和 MIA PPT 之间的相关性。
干预期间(CPM 平均:肘部 195.84kPa,腕部 201.87kPa;MIA 平均:肘部 123.01kPa,腕部 126.06kPa)和干预后(CPM 平均:肘部 126.06kPa,腕部 114.24kPa;MIA 平均:肘部 123.50kPa,腕部 122.16kPa),PPT 从基线显著增加(CPM 和 MIA,P<0.001)。CPM 和 MIA 测量之间也存在显著的中度和正偏线性相关性(r:0.40 至 0.54,P<0.001),控制了基线测量。回归分析显示,CPM PPT 是 MIA PPT 的显著预测因子(P<0.001),模型解释了 MIA PPT 变异的 73%至 85%。
本研究表明,CPM 和 MIA 反应显著相关,CPM 反应是 MIA 反应的显著预测因子。