Suppr超能文献

有和没有慢性肩部疼痛的参与者中压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和条件性疼痛调制(CPM)的可靠性

Reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in Participants with and without Chronic Shoulder Pain.

作者信息

Bilika Paraskevi, Kalamatas-Mavrikas Panagiotis, Vasilis Nikolaos, Strimpakos Nikolaos, Kapreli Eleni

机构信息

Clinical Exercise Physiology & Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 351 32 Lamia, Greece.

Go Physio Laboratory, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Centre, 106 75 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 31;12(17):1734. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171734.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to estimate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in healthy participants and patients with chronic shoulder pain. Additionally, the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) were calculated. Thirty-one healthy volunteers and twenty patients with chronic shoulder pain were assessed using the PPT and CPM by two raters, with a 24 h interval between sessions. Excellent intra-rater reliability was demonstrated for PPT, with similar SEM and SDC when assessed by the same rater. The inter-rater reliability for PPTs in patients was moderate to good (ICC = 0.59-0.89) with higher SEM (73.83-121.98 kPa) and SDC (61.58-97.59) values than the asymptomatic group (ICC = 0.92-0.96, SEM = 49.61-103.12 kPa, SDC = 42.01-56.30) respectively. CPM's intra-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.82) in the patients and moderate (ICC = 0.67) in the asymptomatic group, while inter-rater reliability was low for the asymptomatic group (ICC = 0.37) and extremely low (ICC = 0.074) for the patients, with comparable SEM and SDC outcomes in both groups. PPT and CPM measurements are highly reliable when conducted by the same rater on the same day. Patients had lower inter-rater PPT reliability but better intra-rater CPM reliability. Clinicians need to be mindful of potential variability when interpreting these test results.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估健康参与者和慢性肩痛患者的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和条件性疼痛调制(CPM)的评分者内信度和评分者间信度。此外,还计算了测量标准误(SEM)和最小可检测变化(SDC)。31名健康志愿者和20名慢性肩痛患者由两名评分者使用PPT和CPM进行评估,两次评估之间间隔24小时。PPT显示出优秀的评分者内信度,由同一名评分者评估时具有相似的SEM和SDC。患者PPT的评分者间信度为中度至良好(ICC = 0.59 - 0.89),与无症状组(ICC = 0.92 - 0.96,SEM = 49.61 - 103.12 kPa,SDC = 42.01 - 56.30)相比,SEM(73.83 - 121.98 kPa)和SDC(61.58 - 97.59)值更高。CPM在患者中的评分者内信度良好(ICC = 0.82),在无症状组中为中度(ICC = 0.67),而无症状组的评分者间信度较低(ICC = 0.37),患者的评分者间信度极低(ICC = 0.074),两组的SEM和SDC结果相当。当由同一名评分者在同一天进行测量时,PPT和CPM测量具有高度可靠性。患者的评分者间PPT信度较低,但评分者内CPM信度较好。临床医生在解释这些测试结果时需要注意潜在的变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4573/11395602/cca63946ad85/healthcare-12-01734-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验