Suppr超能文献

比起新热带森林,古热带森林拥有更大的茎生长、木质部分配和地上生物量。

Greater stem growth, woody allocation, and aboveground biomass in Paleotropical forests than in Neotropical forests.

机构信息

Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 80309-0450, USA.

Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2019 Mar;100(3):e02589. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2589. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

Abstract

Forest dynamics and tree species composition vary substantially between Paleotropical and Neotropical forests, but these broad biogeographic regions are treated uniformly in many land models. To assess whether these regional differences translate into variation in productivity and carbon (C) storage, we compiled a database of climate, tree stem growth, litterfall, aboveground net primary production (ANPP), and aboveground biomass across tropical rainforest sites spanning 33 countries throughout Central and South America, Asia, and Australasia, but excluding Africa due to a paucity of available data. Though the sum of litterfall and stem growth (ANPP) did not differ between regions, both stem growth and the ratio of stem growth to litterfall were higher in Paleotropical forests compared to Neotropical forests across the full observed range of ANPP. Greater C allocation to woody growth likely explains the much larger aboveground biomass estimates in Paleotropical forests (~29%, or ~80 Mg DW/ha, greater than in the Neotropics). Climate was similar in Paleo- and Neotropical forests, thus the observed differences in C likely reflect differences in the evolutionary history of species and forest structure and function between regions. Our analysis suggests that Paleotropical forests, which can be dominated by tall-statured Dipterocarpaceae species, may be disproportionate hotspots for aboveground C storage. Land models typically treat these distinct tropical forests with differential structures as a single functional unit, but our findings suggest that this may overlook critical biogeographic variation in C storage potential among regions.

摘要

森林动态和树种组成在泛热带和新热带森林之间有很大的差异,但在许多土地模型中,这两个广泛的生物地理区域被统一对待。为了评估这些区域差异是否转化为生产力和碳(C)储存的变化,我们编制了一个数据库,其中包括跨越中美洲和南美洲、亚洲和澳大拉西亚的 33 个国家的热带雨林地点的气候、树干生长、凋落物、地上净初级生产力(ANPP)和地上生物量数据,但由于缺乏可用数据,非洲的数据未被包括在内。尽管落叶和树干生长(ANPP)的总和在不同地区没有差异,但在整个观测到的 ANPP 范围内,与新热带森林相比,泛热带森林的树干生长和树干生长与落叶的比例都更高。可能是向木质生长分配更多的 C 解释了泛热带森林(29%,或80 Mg DW/ha,比新热带地区高得多)更高的地上生物量估计值。古热带和新热带森林的气候相似,因此观察到的 C 差异可能反映了不同地区物种和森林结构和功能的进化历史差异。我们的分析表明,泛热带森林可能是地上 C 储存的不成比例的热点地区,这些森林可能由高大的龙脑香科物种主导。土地模型通常将这些具有不同结构的独特热带森林视为单一功能单元,但我们的研究结果表明,这可能忽略了不同地区 C 储存潜力的关键生物地理差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验