J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Mar;116(3):415. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000184.
Reports an error in "Is overconfidence a social liability? The effect of verbal versus nonverbal expressions of confidence" by Elizabeth R. Tenney, Nathan L. Meikle, David Hunsaker, Don A. Moore and Cameron Anderson (, Advanced Online Publication, Oct 11, 2018, np). In the article "Is Overconfidence a Social Liability? The Effect of Verbal Versus Nonverbal Expressions of Confidence" by Elizabeth R. Tenney, Nathan L. Meikle, David Hunsaker, Don A. Moore, and Cameron Anderson (. Advance online publication. October 11, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000150), the Editor' Note acknowledging David Dunning as the action editor for this article was omitted. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-50999-001.) What are the reputational consequences of being overconfident? We propose that the channel of confidence expression is one key moderator-that is, whether confidence is expressed verbally or nonverbally. In a series of experiments, participants assessed target individuals (potential collaborators or advisors) who were either overconfident or cautious. Targets expressed confidence, or a lack thereof, verbally or nonverbally. Participants then learned targets' actual performance. Across studies, overconfidence was advantageous initially-regardless of whether targets expressed confidence verbally or nonverbally. After performance was revealed, overconfident targets who had expressed confidence verbally were viewed more negatively than cautious targets; however, overconfident targets who had expressed confidence nonverbally were still viewed more positively than cautious ones. The one condition wherein nonverbal overconfidence was detrimental was when confidence was clearly tied to a falsifiable claim. Results suggest that, compared with verbal statements, nonverbal overconfidence reaps reputational benefits because of its plausible deniability. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
伊丽莎白·R·坦尼、内森·L·米克尔、大卫·洪萨克、唐·A·摩尔和卡梅隆·安德森所著的《过度自信是一种社会负担吗？言语与非言语自信表达的影响》（《个性与社会心理学杂志》，高级在线出版物，2018年10月11日，无页码）存在错误。在伊丽莎白·R·坦尼、内森·L·米克尔、大卫·洪萨克、唐·A·摩尔和卡梅隆·安德森所著的《过度自信是一种社会负担吗？言语与非言语自信表达的影响》（《个性与社会心理学杂志》，高级在线出版物，2018年10月11日，http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000150）一文中，遗漏了承认大卫·邓宁为本文行动编辑的编辑说明。本文的所有版本均已更正。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2018 - 50999 - 001中。）过度自信会带来哪些声誉后果？我们认为，自信表达的渠道是一个关键调节因素，即自信是通过言语还是非言语来表达。在一系列实验中，参与者对过度自信或谨慎的目标个体（潜在合作者或顾问）进行评估。目标个体通过言语或非言语表达自信或缺乏自信。然后参与者了解目标个体的实际表现。在各项研究中，无论目标个体是通过言语还是非言语表达自信，过度自信最初都是有利的。在表现被揭示后，那些通过言语表达自信的过度自信目标个体比谨慎目标个体受到更负面的评价；然而，那些通过非言语表达自信的过度自信目标个体仍然比谨慎目标个体受到更正面的评价。非言语过度自信产生不利影响的一种情况是，自信明显与一个可证伪的主张相关联。结果表明，与言语陈述相比，非言语过度自信因其具有似是而非的可否认性而获得声誉上的好处。（《心理学文摘数据库记录》（c）2019美国心理学会，保留所有权利）
