Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km 380, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Av. Itália, km8, s/n, Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 20;666:508-524. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.209. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
Aquatic contamination in agricultural areas is a global problem, characterized by a complex mixture of organic and inorganic pollutants whose effects on biota are unpredictable and poorly investigated. In this context, in the present study, the Neotropical fish Prochilodus lineatus was confined in situ for 120 days in two sites with different levels of anthropic impact: 1) a fish hatchery station, within the State University of Londrina (reference site - REF) and 2) an agro-ecosystem area in one of the most productive regions of southern Brazil (experimental site - EXP). We evaluated multiple biomarkers at different levels of biological organization, such as biotransformation and antioxidant enzymes, oxidative damages, DNA damages and liver histopathology. We also evaluated the occurrence of 22 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and 6 trace metals in water and sediment; and 33 current-use pesticides (CUPs) in the water; besides the presence of OCPs in the liver and metals in different tissues of the confined fish. The chemical analysis confirmed that the two environments presented different levels of contamination. We verified a distribution gradient of data in the principal component analysis (PCA), separating the REF fish to one side and the fish at the agricultural area (EXP) to the other side. In general, the biomarker responses were more altered in fish from the EXP than fish from the hatchery station; and this fish presented a greater accumulation of endosulfan (an increase of 18× compared to basal value) and showed oxidative, genetic, and histological damage. Through the Biomarkers Response Index (BRI), we found that the EXP fish demonstrated a decrease in health status compared with the REF fish during the confinement time, due to their exposure to a higher concentration of contaminants. In conclusion, the use of multiple biomarkers at different response levels is an important tool for environmental monitoring.
农业区的水生污染是一个全球性问题,其特征是有机和无机污染物的复杂混合物,其对生物群的影响是不可预测的,研究也很少。在这种情况下,本研究将新热带鱼 Prochilodus lineatus 分别在两个具有不同人为影响水平的地点进行了为期 120 天的现场限制实验:1)一个鱼类孵化站,位于隆德里纳州立大学(参考点 - REF),2)巴西南部生产力最高的农业生态系统区(实验点 - EXP)。我们评估了多个生物标志物,包括不同生物组织层次的生物转化和抗氧化酶、氧化损伤、DNA 损伤和肝组织病理学等。我们还评估了水和沉积物中 22 种有机氯农药(OCPs)和 6 种痕量金属的含量;水中 33 种当前使用的农药(CUPs);以及限制鱼类肝脏和不同组织中 OCPs 和金属的含量。化学分析证实,这两个环境的污染水平不同。我们在主成分分析(PCA)中观察到数据的分布梯度,将 REF 鱼类分布在一侧,将农业区的鱼类(EXP)分布在另一侧。一般来说,农业区鱼类的生物标志物反应比孵化站的鱼类更为明显;并且这些鱼的硫丹(与基础值相比增加了 18 倍)积累更多,并表现出氧化、遗传和组织学损伤。通过生物标志物反应指数(BRI),我们发现,与 REF 鱼类相比,EXP 鱼类在限制期间的健康状况下降,这是由于它们暴露于更高浓度的污染物中。总之,在不同的反应水平使用多种生物标志物是环境监测的重要工具。