Hasanvand Shirin, Rassouli Maryam, Mandegari Zahra, Salmani Naiire, Moghimkhan Farzaneh
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):333-343. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.333.
Objective: Over the past three decades, more than 100 instruments have been developed that measure the quality of life. In order to ensure accuracy and authenticity of the measurements, it is essential to utilize the instruments that have proper psychometric properties. Therefore, this critical review study aimed at comparing the instruments that measured the life quality of cancer patients in Iranian studies. Methods: In this study, Persian articles published in Iranian databases (IranMedex, Irandoc Magiran, SID) from 2006 to 2016 were searched, using the following keywords: nursing, cancer, tools, scale, and quality of life. A total number of 159 articles were obtained, of which 33 articles complied with the inclusion criteria of this study and thereby were reviewed. Results: Sixty nine percent of the articles explored the life quality of adult females with breast cancer, and the most-commonly used instrument was a quality-of-Life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology belonging to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. More than half of the studies referred solely to Iranian studies to address psychometric properties. Though, no method was introduced in order to address the validity and reliability of instruments in the articles under consideration. Conclusion: According to the findings, the studies which explored the validity and reliability of instruments concerning the life quality of cancer patients were scarce. Therefore, the researchers should pay further attention to the validity and reliability of instruments for selection of an appropriate instrument in this area of research. Also, the researchers are encouraged to further study the psychometric properties of relevant instruments so that optimal generalizability and authenticity of their findings can be attained.
在过去三十年中,已开发出100多种用于测量生活质量的工具。为确保测量的准确性和真实性,使用具有适当心理测量特性的工具至关重要。因此,本批判性综述研究旨在比较伊朗研究中测量癌症患者生活质量的工具。方法:在本研究中,检索了2006年至2016年在伊朗数据库(IranMedex、Irandoc Magiran、SID)中发表的波斯语文章,使用了以下关键词:护理、癌症、工具、量表和生活质量。共获得159篇文章,其中33篇符合本研究的纳入标准,因此进行了综述。结果:69%的文章探讨了成年女性乳腺癌患者的生活质量,最常用的工具是欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的国际肿瘤学临床试验中使用的生活质量工具。超过一半的研究仅参考伊朗研究来阐述心理测量特性。然而,在所考虑的文章中没有介绍任何方法来阐述工具的有效性和可靠性。结论:根据研究结果,探讨癌症患者生活质量工具有效性和可靠性的研究很少。因此,研究人员在该研究领域选择合适工具时应进一步关注工具的有效性和可靠性。此外,鼓励研究人员进一步研究相关工具的心理测量特性,以便其研究结果能获得最佳的普遍性和真实性。