Department of Population Health and Disease Prevention, Program in Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Department of Chicano/Latino Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
J Biosoc Sci. 2019 Nov;51(6):799-816. doi: 10.1017/S002193201900004X. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Prior research has established associations between neighbourhood poverty and cumulative biological risk (CBR). CBR is conceptualized as indicative of the effects of stress on biological functioning, and is linked with increased morbidity and mortality. Studies suggest that supportive social relationships may be health protective, and may erode under conditions of poverty. This study examines whether social relationships are inversely associated with CBR and whether associations between neighbourhood poverty and CBR are mediated through social relationships. Data were from a stratified probability sample community survey (n=919) of residents of Detroit, Michigan, USA (2002-2003) and from the 2000 US Census. The outcome variable, CBR, included anthropometric and clinical measures. Independent variables included four indicators of social relationships: social support, neighbourhood satisfaction, social cohesion and neighbourhood participation. Multilevel models were used to test both research questions, with neighbourhood poverty and social relationships included at the block group level, and social relationships also included at the individual level, to disentangle individual from neighbourhood effects. Findings suggest some associations between social relationships and CBR after accounting for neighbourhood poverty and individual characteristics. In models that accounted for all indicators of social relationships, individual-level social support was associated with greater CBR (β=0.12, p=0.04), while neighbourhood-level social support was marginally significantly protective of CBR (within-neighbourhood: β=-0.36, p=0.06; between-neighbourhood: β=-0.24, p=0.06). In contrast, individual-level neighbourhood satisfaction was protective of CBR (β=-0.10, p=0.02), with no within-neighbourhood (β=0.06, p=0.54) or between-neighbourhood association (β=-0.04, p=0.38). Results indicate no significant association between either social cohesion or neighbourhood participation and CBR. Associations between neighbourhood poverty and CBR were not mediated by social relationships. These findings suggest that neighbourhood-level social support and individual-level neighbourhood satisfaction may be health protective and that neighbourhood poverty, social support and neighbourhood satisfaction are associated with CBR through independent pathways.
先前的研究已经确定了邻里贫困与累积生物风险(CBR)之间的关联。CBR 被概念化为压力对生物功能影响的指标,与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。研究表明,支持性的社会关系可能具有保护健康的作用,并且在贫困条件下可能会受到侵蚀。本研究检验了社会关系是否与 CBR 呈负相关,以及邻里贫困与 CBR 之间的关联是否通过社会关系来介导。数据来自美国密歇根州底特律市的分层概率抽样社区调查(n=919)(2002-2003 年)和 2000 年美国人口普查。结果变量 CBR 包括人体测量和临床测量。自变量包括社会关系的四个指标:社会支持、邻里满意度、社会凝聚力和邻里参与。使用多层次模型来检验这两个研究问题,将邻里贫困和社会关系纳入街区组水平,并将社会关系也纳入个人水平,以区分个体和邻里效应。研究结果表明,在考虑到邻里贫困和个人特征后,社会关系与 CBR 之间存在一些关联。在考虑到所有社会关系指标的模型中,个人层面的社会支持与更大的 CBR 相关(β=0.12,p=0.04),而邻里层面的社会支持则略微保护 CBR(邻里内:β=-0.36,p=0.06;邻里间:β=-0.24,p=0.06)。相比之下,个人层面的邻里满意度对 CBR 具有保护作用(β=-0.10,p=0.02),邻里内无关联(β=0.06,p=0.54)或邻里间无关联(β=-0.04,p=0.38)。结果表明,社会凝聚力或邻里参与与 CBR 之间没有显著关联。邻里贫困与 CBR 之间的关联不受社会关系的影响。这些发现表明,邻里层面的社会支持和个人层面的邻里满意度可能具有保护健康的作用,而邻里贫困、社会支持和邻里满意度与 CBR 之间存在独立的关联。