Department of Pediatrics (Wall-Wieler), Stanford Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.; Departments of Community Health Sciences (Wall-Wieler, during the conduct of the study; Lee, Roos), and Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Morris); College of Nursing (Thiessen), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Maternal and Child Health (Kenny), The Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Department of Pediatrics (Wall-Wieler), Stanford Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.; Departments of Community Health Sciences (Wall-Wieler, during the conduct of the study; Lee, Roos), and Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Morris); College of Nursing (Thiessen), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Maternal and Child Health (Kenny), The Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
CMAJ. 2019 Feb 25;191(8):E209-E215. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181002.
Prenatal care is one of the most widely used preventive health services; however, use varies substantially. Our objective was to examine prenatal care among women with a history of having a child placed in out-of-home care, and whether their care differed from care among women who did not.
We used linkable administrative data to create a population-based cohort of women whose first 2 children were born in Manitoba, Canada, between Apr. 1, 1998, and Mar. 1, 2015. We measured the level of prenatal care using the Revised Graduated Prenatal Care Utilization Index, which categorizes care into 5 groups: intensive, adequate, intermediate, inadequate and no care. We compared level of prenatal care for women whose first child was placed in care with level of prenatal care for women who had no contact with care services, using 2 multinomial logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios (ORs).
In a cohort of 52 438 mothers, 1284 (2.4%) had their first child placed in out-of-home care before conception of their second child. Mothers whose first child was placed in care had much higher rates of inadequate prenatal care during the pregnancy with their second child than mothers whose first child was not placed in care (33.0% v. 13.4%). The odds of having inadequate rather than adequate prenatal care were more than 4 times higher (OR 4.29, 95% CI 3.68 to 5.01) for women who had their first child placed in care than for women who did not have their first child placed in care.
Mothers with a history of having a child taken into care by the child protection services system are at higher risk of having inadequate or no prenatal care in a subsequent pregnancy compared with mothers with no history of involvement with child protection services.
产前保健是最广泛使用的预防保健服务之一;然而,其利用率差异很大。我们的目的是研究曾有子女被安置在家庭外照料的妇女的产前保健情况,以及她们的保健是否与没有这种经历的妇女有所不同。
我们使用可链接的行政数据创建了一个基于人群的队列,其中包括在加拿大马尼托巴省,1998 年 4 月 1 日至 2015 年 3 月 1 日期间首次生育的 2 名子女的妇女。我们使用修订后的渐进式产前保健利用率指数来衡量产前保健水平,该指数将保健分为 5 组:密集型、足够型、中间型、不足型和无保健。我们使用 2 项多项逻辑回归模型来比较第一胎子女被安置在照料中的妇女与未接触照料服务的妇女的产前保健水平,计算比值比(OR)。
在一个由 52438 名母亲组成的队列中,有 1284 名(2.4%)在其第二胎受孕前,其第一胎子女被安置在家庭外照料。与第一胎子女未被安置在照料中的母亲相比,第一胎子女被安置在照料中的母亲在怀第二胎时接受不足够产前保健的比例要高得多(33.0%比 13.4%)。与第一胎子女未被安置在照料中的母亲相比,第一胎子女被安置在照料中的母亲接受不足够而非足够产前保健的可能性要高出 4 倍以上(OR 4.29,95%CI 3.68 至 5.01)。
与没有涉及儿童保护服务系统经历的母亲相比,有子女被儿童保护服务系统带走的母亲在随后的妊娠中接受不足够或没有产前保健的风险更高。