Widmayer Sonja, Borgwardt Stefan, Lang Undine E, Stieglitz Rolf-Dieter, Huber Christian G
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Psychological Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 5;9:777. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00777. eCollection 2018.
Aggression in psychosis is clinically important. We systematically compiled the evidence on functional correlates of aggression in psychosis searching PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and PsycINFO until September 2017. We included studies reporting functional brain imaging correlates of aggression comparing: (1) affective or non-affective psychosis groups with a history of violence or with aggression operationalized using questionnaires, (2) affective or non-affective psychosis groups with a history of violence or with aggression operationalized using questionnaires to controls, (3) affective or non-affective psychosis groups with a history of violence or with aggression operationalized using questionnaires to controls with diagnoses other than affective or non-affective psychoses. We applied no language restriction and required patients to have a DSM or ICD diagnosis of affective or non-affective psychosis. Our sample consisted of 12 studies with 334 patients and 113 controls. During n-back tasks, violent (VS) as opposed to non-violent persons with schizophrenia (NVS) hypoactivated their inferior parietal lobe. When anticipating shock, VS vs. NVS hyperactivated their medial prefrontal gyrus, cuneus, middle temporal gyrus, and middle occipital gyrus. When viewing negative emotional pictures, VS vs. NVS hyperactivated the middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate, lingual gyrus, precentral gyrus, globus pallidus, mid-cingulate, and precuneus. Due to the small number of available studies, sample overlap, and insufficient reporting of relevant moderators we could not conduct a meta-analysis. We found non-systematic functional correlates of aggression in schizophrenia. Only few studies using varied paradigms and often overlapping samples have been conducted. There have been no attempts to replicate any of the observed findings in the published literature. Focusing on future directions, we recommend that authors adhere to clear definitions of aggression, measurements of psychopathology, comorbidities, and medication. In particular, replication studies would allow for a better synthesis of the findings. CRD42016048579.
精神病中的攻击行为在临床上具有重要意义。我们系统性地收集了截至2017年9月在PubMed、EMBASE、ScienceDirect和PsycINFO上搜索到的关于精神病中攻击行为功能相关性的证据。我们纳入了报告攻击行为功能性脑成像相关性的研究,比较了:(1) 有暴力史或使用问卷对攻击行为进行操作化的情感性或非情感性精神病组;(2) 有暴力史或使用问卷对攻击行为进行操作化的情感性或非情感性精神病组与对照组;(3) 有暴力史或使用问卷对攻击行为进行操作化的情感性或非情感性精神病组与除情感性或非情感性精神病外其他诊断的对照组。我们没有设置语言限制,要求患者有DSM或ICD诊断的情感性或非情感性精神病。我们的样本包括12项研究,共334例患者和113例对照。在n-back任务中,与非暴力的精神分裂症患者(NVS)相比,暴力的精神分裂症患者(VS)的顶下小叶激活不足。在预期电击时,VS组与NVS组相比,其内侧前额叶回、楔叶、颞中回和枕中回激活增强。在观看负面情绪图片时,VS组与NVS组相比,额中回、额下回、前扣带回、舌回、中央前回、苍白球、扣带中部和楔前叶激活增强。由于可用研究数量少、样本重叠以及相关调节因素报告不足,我们无法进行荟萃分析。我们发现精神分裂症中攻击行为存在非系统性的功能相关性。仅进行了少数使用不同范式且样本经常重叠的研究。在已发表的文献中,没有尝试复制任何观察到的结果。着眼于未来方向,我们建议作者坚持对攻击行为、精神病理学测量、共病和药物治疗进行明确的定义。特别是,重复研究将有助于更好地综合研究结果。CRD42016048579。