Freitas Cintia G, Bacon Christine D, Souza-Neto Advaldo C, Collevatti Rosane G
Laboratório de Genética & Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Feb 5;10:55. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00055. eCollection 2019.
Environmental and geographical variables are known drivers of community assembly, however their influence on phylogenetic structure and phylogenetic beta diversity of lineages within different bioregions is not well-understood. Using Neotropical palms as a model, we investigate how environmental and geographical variables affect the assembly of lineages into bioregions across an evolutionary time scale. We also determine lineage shifts between tropical (TRF) and non-tropical (non-TRF) forests. Our results identify that distance and area explain phylogenetic dissimilarity among bioregions. Lineages in smaller bioregions are a subset of larger bioregions and contribute significantly to the nestedness component of phylogenetic dissimilarity, here interpreted as evidence for a bioregional shift. We found a significant tendency of habitat shifts occurring preferentially between TRF and non-TRF bioregions (31 shifts) than from non-TRF to TRF (24) or from TRF to TRF (11) and non-TRF to non-TRF (9). Our results also present cases where low dissimilarity is found between TRF and non-TRF bioregions. Most bioregions showed phylogenetic clustering and larger bioregions tended to be more clustered than smaller ones, with a higher species turnover component of phylogenetic dissimilarity. However, phylogenetic structure did not differ between TRF and non-TRF bioregions and diversification rates were higher in only two lineages, Attaleinae and Bactridinae, which are widespread and overabundant in both TRF and non-TRF bioregions. Area and distance significantly affected Neotropical palm community assembly and contributed more than environmental variables. Despite palms being emblematic humid forest elements, we found multiple shifts from humid to dry bioregions, showing that palms are also important components of these environments.
环境和地理变量是群落组装的已知驱动因素,然而它们对不同生物区域内谱系的系统发育结构和系统发育β多样性的影响尚未得到充分理解。以新热带棕榈为模型,我们研究环境和地理变量如何在进化时间尺度上影响谱系组装到生物区域的过程。我们还确定了热带(TRF)和非热带(非TRF)森林之间的谱系转移。我们的结果表明,距离和面积可以解释生物区域之间的系统发育差异。较小生物区域中的谱系是较大生物区域的一个子集,并对系统发育差异的嵌套成分有显著贡献,在此被解释为生物区域转移的证据。我们发现,栖息地转移显著倾向于优先发生在TRF和非TRF生物区域之间(31次转移),而不是从非TRF到TRF(24次)或从TRF到TRF(11次)以及非TRF到非TRF(9次)。我们的结果还呈现了TRF和非TRF生物区域之间相似度较低的情况。大多数生物区域显示出系统发育聚类,并且较大的生物区域比较小的生物区域更倾向于聚类,系统发育差异中物种周转率成分更高。然而,TRF和非TRF生物区域之间的系统发育结构没有差异,并且只有两个谱系(Attaleinae和Bactridinae)的多样化率较高,这两个谱系在TRF和非TRF生物区域都广泛分布且数量众多。面积和距离显著影响新热带棕榈群落组装,并且比环境变量的贡献更大。尽管棕榈是典型的湿润森林元素,但我们发现了多次从湿润生物区域到干燥生物区域的转移,表明棕榈也是这些环境的重要组成部分。