• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于响应修正的计算机自适应测试的统计基础。

Statistical Foundations for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Response Revision.

机构信息

University of Georgia, Athens, USA.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA.

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):375-394. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09662-9. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-019-09662-9
PMID:30805879
Abstract

The compatibility of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) with response revision has been a topic of debate in psychometrics for many years. The problem is to provide test takers opportunities to change their answers during the test, while discouraging deceptive strategies from their side and preserving the statistical efficiency of the traditional CAT. The estimating approach proposed in Wang et al. (Stat Sin 27(4):1987-2010, 2017), based on the nominal response model, allows test takers to provide more than one answer to each item during the test, which they all contribute to the interim and final ability estimation. This approach is here reformulated, extended to incorporate a larger class of polytomous and dichotomous item response theory models, and investigated with simulation studies under different test-taking strategies.

摘要

计算机化自适应测验(CAT)与应答修订的兼容性在心理测量学中已经争论了很多年。问题是要为应试者在测试期间提供更改答案的机会,同时阻止他们使用欺骗策略,并保持传统 CAT 的统计效率。Wang 等人提出的估计方法(Stat Sin 27(4):1987-2010, 2017),基于名义反应模型,允许应试者在测试期间对每个项目提供多个答案,这些答案都有助于中间和最终能力估计。本文对该方法进行了重新表述,将其扩展到包含更大类别的多分制和二分制项目反应理论模型,并在不同的应试策略下进行了模拟研究。

相似文献

1
Statistical Foundations for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Response Revision.基于响应修正的计算机自适应测试的统计基础。
Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):375-394. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09662-9. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
The irtQ R package: a user-friendly tool for item response theorybased test data analysis and calibration.irtQ R 包:一个用于基于项目反应理论的测试数据分析和校准的用户友好型工具。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:23. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.23. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
3
simpolycat: an SAS program for conducting CAT simulation based on polytomous IRT models.simpolycat:一个用于基于多分类IRT模型进行CAT模拟的SAS程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):499-506. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.499.
4
Introduction to the LIVECAT web-based computerized adaptive testing platform.LIVECAT 网络版计算机化自适应测试平台简介。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:27. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.27. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing.计算机自适应测试中认知错误的多分类建模
J Appl Meas. 2001;2(4):356-78.
6
Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.效度量表为理想反应的平衡量表:二分法与多分法传统和IRT 评分。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):878-91. doi: 10.1037/a0036430. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
7
Computerized adaptive testing: the capitalization on chance problem.计算机化自适应测验:机遇利用问题。
Span J Psychol. 2012 Mar;15(1):424-41. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37348.
8
Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment.开发定制工具:题库与计算机自适应评估
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:95-108. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9168-6. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
9
Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.使用二分法Rasch模型分析多分类项目。
J Appl Meas. 2013;14(1):44-56.
10
The impacts of computer adaptive testing from a variety of perspectives.从各种角度看计算机自适应测试的影响。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 May 29;14:12. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.12. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
The Block Item Pocket Method for Reviewable Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.用于可复查多维计算机自适应测试的区组项目库方法
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jan;45(1):22-36. doi: 10.1177/0146621620947177. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of Response Changes in the GRE Revised General Test.GRE 修订版通用考试中反应变化的调查。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Dec;75(6):1002-1020. doi: 10.1177/0013164415573988. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
2
The Benefit of a Switch: Answer-Changing on Multiple-Choice Exams by First-Year Dental Students.转变的益处:一年级牙科学生在多项选择题考试中更改答案的情况
J Dent Educ. 2017 Jan;81(1):110-115.
3
Counterfactual thinking and the first instinct fallacy.反事实思维与首因谬误。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 May;88(5):725-35. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.725.