a Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences , University of New Mexico , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Jun;35(2):95-108. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2019.1576224. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
The purpose of this study was to explore the errors and revisions (i.e., repairs) that 3- and 4-year-old children who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) make as they construct 2-3-word utterances using graphic symbols. The current study involves supplemental analyses from a previously published manuscript. Various types of errors and revisions for four different semantic-syntactic structures-agent-action-object, entity-attribute, entity-locative, and possessor-entity-were analysed to explore patterns and differences across utterance types. Results indicated that the majority of errors were made during the baseline phase, and that error types varied depending on the utterance type. For example, inversions were common for agent-action-object utterances, but omissions were common for entity-attribute utterances. When the participants revised their utterances, the resulting messages were more accurate the majority of the time, regardless of utterance type. Past research has highlighted frequent word order errors within graphic symbol messages, but the current results indicate that error types are dependent upon utterance type. A more refined approach, then, is required to better our understanding of how children approach the task of learning to produce graphic symbol utterances.
本研究旨在探索需要辅助沟通的 3-4 岁儿童在使用图形符号构建 2-3 个单词的话语时会出现哪些错误和修正(即纠正)。本研究是之前发表的手稿的补充分析。为了探索不同话语类型之间的模式和差异,我们分析了四种不同语义句法结构(施动者-动作-对象、实体-属性、实体-方位和拥有者-实体)的各种类型的错误和修正。结果表明,大多数错误发生在基线阶段,而且错误类型取决于话语类型。例如,施动者-动作-对象话语中常见颠倒,而实体-属性话语中常见省略。当参与者修正他们的话语时,大多数时候得到的信息更准确,无论话语类型如何。过去的研究强调了图形符号信息中常见的词序错误,但目前的结果表明,错误类型取决于话语类型。因此,需要更精细的方法来更好地理解儿童如何学习生成图形符号话语。