• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于严重程度指数开发的决策理论方法。

A decision theoretic methodology for severity index development.

作者信息

Gustafson D H, Fryback D G, Rose J H, Yick V, Prokop C T, Detmer D E, Moore J

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1986 Jan-Mar;6(1):27-35. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8600600106.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X8600600106
PMID:3080651
Abstract

Severity indices are a key element in evaluation of health programs. But the methodologies used in development of such indices are rarely clearly defined. Moreover, there have been no tests of transportability of the index development methodologies that do exist, so there is no guarantee that panels of physicians convened by different facilitators would produce indices with similar performance characteristics. This paper describes a replicable index development strategy, a heart disease severity index developed by using that methodology, and a test of that methodology's transportability.

摘要

严重程度指数是卫生项目评估中的关键要素。但此类指数开发所采用的方法很少有明确界定。此外,现有的指数开发方法从未经过可移植性测试,因此无法保证由不同协调人召集的医生小组会得出具有相似性能特征的指数。本文描述了一种可复制的指数开发策略、运用该方法开发的心脏病严重程度指数以及对该方法可移植性的测试。

相似文献

1
A decision theoretic methodology for severity index development.一种用于严重程度指数开发的决策理论方法。
Med Decis Making. 1986 Jan-Mar;6(1):27-35. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8600600106.
2
[14. Coronary heart diseases: how the general practitioner can improve the prognosis].[14. 冠状动脉疾病:全科医生如何改善预后]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2000 Dec 14;142(51-52):I-X, quiz XI-XII.
3
Clinical use of the combined Sclarovsky Birnbaum Severity and Anderson Wilkins Acuteness scores from the pre-hospital ECG in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
J Electrocardiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;47(4):566-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
4
Barriers to patients seeking emergency care for acute coronary heart disease.急性冠状动脉疾病患者寻求急诊治疗的障碍。
JAMA. 2000 Nov 1;284(17):2184.
5
Coronary artery calcium scoring: are the data rock solid?冠状动脉钙化评分:数据可靠吗?
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;56(3):230-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Apr 3.
6
[Prehospital accommodation of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Summary position paper of the German Society for Cardiological, Heart and Circulatory Research e.V. and the German Interdisciplinary Coalition for Intensive and Emergency Medicine].[急性冠状动脉综合征患者的院前安置。德国心脏病学、心脏与循环研究协会及德国重症与急诊医学跨学科联盟立场文件摘要]
Z Kardiol. 2004 Nov;93(11):915-6. doi: 10.1007/s00392-004-0184-z.
7
[Heart-related anxiety--when does it become hypochondriac?].
MMW Fortschr Med. 2011 May 12;153(19):35-7, 39.
8
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction).ACC/AHA ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南——执行摘要。美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订1999年急性心肌梗死患者管理指南写作委员会)报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 4;44(3):671-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.002.
9
Symptoms you should know by heart. How to recognize "atypical" danger signs sooner to get help faster.你应该牢记的症状。如何更快地识别“非典型”危险信号以便更快地获得帮助。
Heart Advis. 2006 Apr;9(4):1, 7.
10
[The diagnostic and prognostic value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in assessing the severity of coronary disease in the acute phase of an acute myocardial infarct].[12导联心电图在评估急性心肌梗死急性期冠状动脉疾病严重程度中的诊断和预后价值]
Rev Port Cardiol. 1998 Jul-Aug;17(7-8):587-95.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining and identifying early-onset lung disease in cystic fibrosis with cumulative clinical characteristics.用累积的临床特征定义和识别囊性纤维化的早发性肺病。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2363-2373. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26040. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
The Multimorbidity Index: A Tool for Assessing the Prognosis of Patients from Their History of Illness.共病指数:一种根据患者病史评估预后的工具。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Oct 13;4(1):1235. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1235. eCollection 2016.
3
How can research keep up with eHealth? Ten strategies for increasing the timeliness and usefulness of eHealth research.
研究如何跟上电子健康的步伐?提高电子健康研究及时性和实用性的十大策略。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 19;16(2):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2925.
4
THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF A MODEL TO PREDICT SUSTAINABILITY OF CHANGE IN HEALTH CARE SETTINGS.预测医疗环境中变革可持续性的模型的开发与应用。
Int J Inf Syst Change Manag. 2011;5(1):22-35. doi: 10.1504/IJISCM.2011.039068. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
5
Standardized diagnostic criteria for developmental dysplasia of the hip in early infancy.婴幼儿发育性髋关节发育不良的标准化诊断标准。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3451-61. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2066-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
6
Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model.开发和验证一个预测 IHCS 实施成功的模型:实施准备度模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):707-13. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005546.
7
Assessing a team's problem solving ability: evaluation of the Team Problem Solving Assessment Tool (TPSAT).评估团队的问题解决能力:团队问题解决评估工具(TPSAT)的评价
Health Care Manag Sci. 1999 Dec;2(4):205-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1019004332123.
8
Validation of the pneumonia severity index. Importance of study-specific recalibration.肺炎严重程度指数的验证。特定研究重新校准的重要性。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jun;14(6):333-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00351.x.
9
Use of a neural network as a predictive instrument for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery.使用神经网络作为心脏手术后重症监护病房住院时间的预测工具。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:666-72.