Suppr超能文献

八旬和九旬老人通过远程卒中进行静脉溶栓的功能预后:单中心经验。

Functional Outcomes of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians Through Telestroke: Single-Center Experience.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jan;26(1):18-23. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0305. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

Abstract

Patients aged ≥80 years are often underrepresented in stroke trials. Observational studies have shown that older patients have worse outcomes compared with younger patients, but outcomes in patients aged ≥80 years treated with intravenous (IV)-alteplase specifically through telestroke (TS) have not been studied. To compare clinical and safety outcomes in stroke patients aged ≥80 and 60-79 years treated with IV-alteplase via TS. The Medical University of South Carolina TS database was analyzed to identify IV-alteplase-treated patients aged 60-79 and ≥80 years between January 2015 and March 2018. Baseline demographics and TS-specific variables were compared. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Safety outcomes were evaluated by comparing symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratio (OR) for good outcome (mRS 0-2) in the older age group at 90 days. IV-alteplase was used in 151 patients in ≥80 years age group and 273 patients in 60-79 years age group. The older age group had more women and a higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The mean "ED-door-to-TS-consultant-login" time was shorter (21.6 min vs. 25.6 min; p = 0.048), but "TS-consultant-login-to-alteplase" time was longer (22.1 min vs. 19.3 min; p = 0.01) in the older age group. No difference was noted in eventual "door-to-needle" time. The older age group had fewer good outcomes (39.1% vs. 74%; p = 0.001) and more deaths (38% vs. 14%; p = 0.001) at 90 days. The sICH rates were similar in the two groups. The OR for good outcome in ≥80 years age group was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12-0.34) after controlling for baseline variables. Stroke patients aged ≥80 years treated via TS have similar post-thrombolysis hemorrhage rates but worse clinical outcomes compared with patients aged 60-79 years.

摘要

80 岁以上的患者在中风试验中往往代表性不足。观察性研究表明,与年轻患者相比,老年患者的预后更差,但通过远程卒中(TS)接受静脉(IV)-阿替普酶治疗的 80 岁以上患者的结局尚未得到研究。本研究旨在比较通过 TS 接受 IV-阿替普酶治疗的 80 岁以上和 60-79 岁中风患者的临床和安全性结局。分析了南卡罗来纳医科大学的 TS 数据库,以确定 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 3 月期间接受 IV-阿替普酶治疗的年龄在 60-79 岁和 80 岁以上的患者。比较了基线人口统计学和 TS 特异性变量。采用 90 天改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评估临床结局。通过比较症状性颅内出血(sICH)评估安全性结局。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定 90 天时年龄较大组的良好结局(mRS 0-2)的优势比(OR)。在 80 岁以上年龄组中,有 151 名患者使用了 IV-阿替普酶,在 60-79 岁年龄组中有 273 名患者使用了 IV-阿替普酶。年龄较大组的女性更多,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分更高。平均“ED-门到 TS-顾问登录”时间较短(21.6 分钟比 25.6 分钟;p=0.048),但“TS-顾问登录到阿替普酶”时间较长(22.1 分钟比 19.3 分钟;p=0.01)。两组最终的“门到针”时间没有差异。年龄较大组的良好结局(39.1%比 74%;p=0.001)较少,90 天时死亡(38%比 14%;p=0.001)更多。两组 sICH 发生率相似。在校正基线变量后,年龄在 80 岁以上组的良好结局 OR 为 0.20(95%CI:0.12-0.34)。与 60-79 岁年龄组相比,通过 TS 治疗的 80 岁以上中风患者溶栓后出血率相似,但临床结局较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验