Instituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología (IPSIBAT), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMDP), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Psychol Rep. 2020 Jun;123(3):605-632. doi: 10.1177/0033294119832978. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Working memory is a process of great relevance during childhood due to its role in diverse complex skills. Like the rest of executive functions, it is highly sensitive to environmental influences, so it is assumed that it could be modified through targeted interventions. A large number of working memory training studies in children aim to achieve transfer effects both on this process and on those with which it is related. Although some promising results have been found, the efficacy of working memory training cannot be affirmed; methodological quality of studies is one of the main reasons for this. Compliance with basic methodological criteria (inclusion of a control group that must preferably be active, random assignment of participants to groups) has a great impact on the internal validity of the studies. Furthermore, the need to control for the effects of motivational factors associated with the intervention is added and emphasized. This study reviews the fulfillment of these criteria in process-based working memory training literature in children, analyzing its impact on internal validity. Limitations of the field in relation to the lack of compliance with the proposed criteria are discussed and alternatives are suggested in order to improve the quality of future studies.
工作记忆在儿童时期非常重要,因为它在多种复杂技能中发挥作用。与其他执行功能一样,它对外界环境的影响非常敏感,因此可以通过有针对性的干预来进行修改。大量针对儿童工作记忆训练的研究旨在实现对该过程及其相关过程的转移效应。尽管已经发现了一些有希望的结果,但工作记忆训练的效果还不能被肯定;研究的方法质量是其中一个主要原因。遵守基本的方法学标准(包括一个最好是积极的对照组,以及参与者被随机分配到组中)对研究的内部有效性有很大的影响。此外,还需要控制与干预相关的动机因素的影响。本研究综述了儿童基于过程的工作记忆训练文献中这些标准的执行情况,分析了其对内部有效性的影响。讨论了该领域在缺乏符合既定标准方面的局限性,并提出了改进未来研究质量的替代方案。