Suppr超能文献

血小板单采项目的成本效益分析。

Cost-benefit analysis of a plateletapheresis program.

作者信息

McFarland J G, Larson E B, Hillman R S, Slichter S J

出版信息

Transfusion. 1986 Jan-Feb;26(1):91-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1986.26186124042.x.

Abstract

We determined costs and benefits of a community donor plateletapheresis program (CDPP) designed to provide HLA-matched platelet transfusions for patients who were refractory to random-donor platelets (RDPs). Costs of establishing and maintaining the CDPP were $127,520 for the first year (1982). Benefits were expressed as cost savings attributed to the CDPP. After the program began, the use of RDP in the community was 17,458 units less than projected. Estimates of net cost savings during the first year ranged from $177,570 to $272,253 (1982 dollars; cost-to-benefit ratios were 1:1.39 to 1:2.14.) In a matched cohort study of marrow transplant patients, CDPP platelet transfusions were as effective as those from family donors while total platelet and red cell use was unchanged. In patients with acute leukemia treated with chemotherapy, significant reduction in both platelet and red cell use was seen after institution of CDPP support. We conclude that the CDPP is a cost-effective approach to platelet support.

摘要

我们确定了一项社区供体血小板单采项目(CDPP)的成本和效益,该项目旨在为对随机供体血小板(RDP)无效的患者提供 HLA 匹配的血小板输注。1982 年建立和维持 CDPP 的第一年成本为 127,520 美元。效益以 CDPP 带来的成本节约来表示。该项目启动后,社区中 RDP 的使用量比预期少 17,458 单位。第一年的净成本节约估计在 177,570 美元至 272,253 美元之间(1982 年美元;成本效益比为 1:1.39 至 1:2.14)。在一项针对骨髓移植患者的匹配队列研究中,CDPP 血小板输注与来自家庭供体的输注效果相同,而血小板和红细胞的总使用量没有变化。在接受化疗的急性白血病患者中,采用 CDPP 支持后,血小板和红细胞的使用量均显著减少。我们得出结论,CDPP 是一种具有成本效益的血小板支持方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验