Maatman T J, Montague D K, Martin L M
Urology. 1986 Feb;27(2):132-5. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90369-9.
Two hundred consecutive men presenting with a chief complaint of impotence have been evaluated with a protocol involving one or two outpatient visits. The initial evaluation for all patients consisted of a history taken in a conventional manner and supplemented by a patient-completed sexual function questionnaire, physical examination, serum testosterone and prolactin, and two-night nocturnal penile tumescence studies. Following the initial evaluation the patients were placed in one of three categories: (1) organic impotence, (2) functional impotence, (3) ambiguous impotence (mixed functional and organic impotence or organic impotence of undetermined etiology). Patients in the latter group underwent additional testing including penile vascular studies, two-hour oral glucose tolerance test, and psychiatric consultation. With this protocol, patients can be efficiently and effectively evaluated as outpatients with costs ranging from +250 to +450.
对200名以阳痿为主诉的男性患者进行了评估,采用了包括一到两次门诊就诊的方案。所有患者的初始评估包括以传统方式采集病史,并辅以患者填写的性功能问卷、体格检查、血清睾酮和催乳素检查,以及为期两晚的夜间阴茎勃起研究。初始评估后,患者被分为三类:(1)器质性阳痿,(2)功能性阳痿,(3)不明原因阳痿(功能性和器质性混合阳痿或病因不明的器质性阳痿)。后一组患者接受了额外的检查,包括阴茎血管研究、两小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验和精神科会诊。通过该方案,可以对患者作为门诊患者进行高效、有效的评估,费用在250美元至450美元之间。