Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Institute for Pathology and Bacteriology, Otto Wagner Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Target Oncol. 2019 Apr;14(2):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00623-x.
Analysis of cell-free DNA from blood could provide an alternative method for identifying genomic changes in the tumors of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
We compared the performance of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Cobas) for detecting EGFR mutations in cell-free plasma DNA.
Plasma samples from patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma were analyzed for EGFR T790M, exon 19 deletions, and L858R mutations by both ddPCR and Cobas.
T790M testing was performed in 354 plasma samples collected from 129 patients. The concordance rate between ddPCR and Cobas for T790M, sensitivity, and specificity were 86, 100, and 85%, respectively. Exon 19 deletions were analyzed in 196 plasma samples obtained from 71 of the 129 patients using both platforms. The concordance rate between ddPCR and Cobas for exon 19 deletions, sensitivity, and specificity were 90, 92, and 89%, respectively. L858R mutations were studied in 124 plasma samples obtained from 44 of the 129 patients using both assays. The concordance rate between ddPCR and Cobas for L858R, sensitivity, and specificity were 90, 91, and 89%, respectively. In patients who progressed under treatment with an EGFR TKI (n = 50), the T790M positivity rate was 66% using ddPCR, but only 24% using Cobas.
We observed a high concordance between ddPCR and Cobas in detecting EGFR mutations in plasma samples of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, but ddPCR was more sensitive than Cobas.
分析血液中的游离 DNA 可能为检测晚期肺腺癌患者肿瘤中的基因组变化提供一种替代方法。
我们比较了数字液滴 PCR(ddPCR)和 Cobas EGFR 突变检测 v2(Cobas)在检测游离血浆 DNA 中 EGFR 突变的性能。
对 129 例晚期 EGFR 突变型肺腺癌患者的血浆样本进行 ddPCR 和 Cobas 检测,以分析 EGFR T790M、外显子 19 缺失和 L858R 突变。
对 354 份来自 129 例患者的血浆样本进行了 T790M 检测。ddPCR 与 Cobas 检测 T790M 的一致性率、灵敏度和特异性分别为 86%、100%和 85%。使用两种平台对来自 71 例患者的 196 份血浆样本进行了外显子 19 缺失分析。ddPCR 与 Cobas 检测外显子 19 缺失的一致性率、灵敏度和特异性分别为 90%、92%和 89%。使用两种检测方法对来自 44 例患者的 124 份血浆样本进行了 L858R 突变分析。ddPCR 与 Cobas 检测 L858R 的一致性率、灵敏度和特异性分别为 90%、91%和 89%。在接受 EGFR TKI 治疗进展的患者(n=50)中,ddPCR 检测 T790M 阳性率为 66%,而 Cobas 检测阳性率仅为 24%。
我们观察到 ddPCR 和 Cobas 在检测晚期 EGFR 突变型肺腺癌患者血浆样本中的 EGFR 突变具有很高的一致性,但 ddPCR 比 Cobas 更敏感。