Yang L, Su X P, Ye F, Zhang W, Xing Y, Li H, Ji Z, Liu Q, Liu B B, Niu J
Beijing Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100070, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 20;36(12):899-903. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2018.12.004.
To investigate the current status of prevention and control of occupational hazards in a city in 2017, to understand the capability to prevent and control occupational hazards and the level of occupational health supervision and management, and to propose measures to urge employers to assume the main responsibility for the prevention and control of occupational diseases. An analysis of the main factors influencing the prevention and control of occupational hazards in the city was performed to screen out six semi-quantitative assessment indicators (including the training of the main responsible persons and occupational health management personnel in companies) and four qualitative assessment indicators (including the coverage of supervision and inspection of occupational hazards performed by the district safety supervision department) , which could be used to measure the prevention and control effects of regional occupational hazards. Each indicator was scored. The typical investigation method was used to do data review and on-site inspection of 170 companies, 17 district-level occupational health supervision departments, and 16 sub-district (township) occupational health supervision departments in the city from October to December, 2017. The prevention and control of occupational diseases in each district was scored, and the completion rate and completion situation of each indicator in the city were analyzed. The mean score of prevention and control of occupational hazards in the city was 84.9. The scores of two districts were relatively high, being 88.9 and 88.7, respectively; the scores of 9 (52.9%) districts were higher than 85. The pass rate of training for the main responsible persons and occupational health management personnel in companies in the city was 95.9%, the pass rate of occupational health training for workers was 84.7%, the pass rate of occupational health examination for workers was 96.5%, the pass rate for the inspection of occupational hazardous factors in workplaces was 95.3%, the pass rate for notifying occupational hazards in workplaces is 95.9%, and the pass rate for applying the warning signs of occupational hazards in workplaces was 76.5%. The awareness of the importance of prevention and control of occupational hazards in all districts of the city has been increased, but the effectiveness of occupational health training for workers needs to be strengthened. The supply and demand of occupational health technical services are still not matched, and the ways and methods of occupational health supervision and inspection need to be improved.
为调查2017年某城市职业危害防治现状,了解职业危害防治能力及职业卫生监督管理水平,提出督促用人单位落实职业病防治主体责任的措施。对该市职业危害防治的主要影响因素进行分析,筛选出6个半定量评估指标(包括企业主要负责人和职业卫生管理人员培训等)和4个定性评估指标(包括区安全监管部门职业危害监督检查覆盖率等),用于衡量区域职业危害防治效果。对各指标进行评分。采用典型调查方法,于2017年10月至12月对该市170家企业、17个区级职业卫生监督部门和16个街道(乡镇)级职业卫生监督部门进行资料查阅和现场检查。对各区职业病防治情况进行评分,分析全市各指标完成率及完成情况。该市职业危害防治平均得分为84.9分。两个区得分较高,分别为88.9分和88.7分;9个区(52.9%)得分高于85分。该市企业主要负责人和职业卫生管理人员培训合格率为95.9%,劳动者职业卫生培训合格率为84.7%,劳动者职业健康检查合格率为96.5%,工作场所职业危害因素检测合格率为95.3%,工作场所职业危害告知率为95.9%,工作场所职业危害警示标识设置率为76.5%。该市各区职业危害防治重要性的认识有所提高,但劳动者职业卫生培训效果有待加强。职业卫生技术服务供需仍不匹配,职业卫生监督检查方式方法有待改进。