Peres N A R, Souza N L, Furtado E L, Timmer L W
Former Ph.D. Student.
Professor.
Plant Dis. 2004 Jul;88(7):731-735. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.7.731.
Postbloom fruit drop (PFD) of citrus, caused by Colletotrichum acutatum, infects petals of citrus flowers and produces orange-brown lesions that induce the abscission of young fruitlets and the retention of calyces. Proper timing of fungicide applications is essential for good disease control. Different systems for timing of fungicide applications for control of PFD in a major citrus-growing region in southern São Paulo state in Brazil were evaluated from 1999 to 2002. The following programs were compared to an unsprayed control using counts of diseased flowers, persistent calyces, or fruit: (i) a phenology-based program currently recommended in Brazil with one application at early and another at peak bloom; (ii) the Florida PFD model; (iii) the post-bloom fruit drop-fungicide application decision system (PFD-FAD), a new computer-assisted decision method; and (iv) grower's choice. In 1999, no disease developed, sprays applied with the phenology-based program had no effect, and the Florida PFD model saved two sprays compared with the phenology-based program. In 2000, PFD was moderate and the phenology-based and grower's choice treatments had a significantly lower number of persistent calyces and higher fruit numbers than the control, but no differences were found between those treatments and the PFD model. In 2001, PFD was severe with considerable yield loss. The PFD model, the phenology-based program, and the grower's choice reduced flower blight and the number of persistent calyces, and improved fruit yields with two to three applications, but the PFD-FAD achieved comparable yields with only one spray. In 2002, the disease was mild, with no yield loss, and the Florida PFD model and the PFD-FAD saved one spray compared with the other systems. The PFD model and the PFD-FAD were equally effective for timing fungicide applications to control PFD in Brazil. Scouting of trees is simpler with PFD-FAD; therefore, this system is recommended and should eliminate unnecessary sprays and reduce costs for growers.
由尖孢炭疽菌引起的柑橘采前落果(PFD),会感染柑橘花的花瓣并产生橙褐色病斑,从而导致幼果脱落和萼片留存。正确的杀菌剂施药时间对于有效控制病害至关重要。1999年至2002年期间,在巴西圣保罗州南部一个主要柑橘种植区,对用于控制采前落果的不同杀菌剂施药时间系统进行了评估。将以下方案与未喷施的对照进行比较,比较指标为病花数量、留存萼片数量或果实数量:(i)巴西目前推荐的基于物候学的方案,在初花期和盛花期各喷施一次;(ii)佛罗里达采前落果模型;(iii)采后落果 - 杀菌剂施用决策系统(PFD - FAD),一种新的计算机辅助决策方法;(iv)种植者的选择。1999年,未发病,基于物候学方案的喷施没有效果,与基于物候学方案相比,佛罗里达采前落果模型节省了两次喷施。2000年,采前落果情况中等,基于物候学的处理和种植者的选择处理相比对照,留存萼片数量显著减少,果实数量更多,但这些处理与采前落果模型之间未发现差异。2001年,采前落果严重,产量损失较大。采前落果模型、基于物候学的方案和种植者的选择通过两到三次喷施减少了花腐病和留存萼片数量,并提高了果实产量,但采后落果 - 杀菌剂施用决策系统仅喷施一次就实现了相当的产量。2002年,病害较轻,没有产量损失,与其他系统相比,佛罗里达采前落果模型和采后落果 - 杀菌剂施用决策系统节省了一次喷施。采前落果模型和采后落果 - 杀菌剂施用决策系统在确定控制巴西采前落果的杀菌剂施药时间方面同样有效。使用采后落果 - 杀菌剂施用决策系统对树木进行巡查更简单;因此,推荐该系统,它应能消除不必要的喷施并降低种植者的成本。