• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Defining and Developing a Generic Framework for Monitoring Data Quality in Clinical Research.定义并开发一个临床研究数据质量监测的通用框架。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1300-1309. eCollection 2018.
2
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
3
Reporting quality of N-of-1 trials published between 1985 and 2013: a systematic review.1985年至2013年间发表的单病例随机对照试验的报告质量:一项系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.016. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
Risk-adapted monitoring is not inferior to extensive on-site monitoring: Results of the ADAMON cluster-randomised study.风险适应性监测不劣于广泛的现场监测:ADAMON 整群随机研究结果
Clin Trials. 2017 Dec;14(6):584-596. doi: 10.1177/1740774517724165. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
5
Assessing data quality and the variability of source data verification auditing methods in clinical research settings.评估临床研究环境中数据质量和源数据核查审核方法的可变性。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 19.
6
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
7
Toward a view-oriented approach for aligning RDF-based biomedical repositories.迈向一种基于视图的方法来对齐基于RDF的生物医学知识库。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(1):50-5. doi: 10.3414/ME13-02-0020. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
8
[What everybody should know about good clinical practices].[关于良好临床实践每个人都应该知道的事]
Biomedica. 2015 Apr-Jun;35(2):274-84. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572015000200016.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on minimum standards and exemplary attributes of clinical trial sites.美国临床肿瘤学会关于临床试验场所最低标准和示范属性的声明。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2562-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6398. Epub 2008 Apr 7.
10
Towards the development of a comprehensive framework: Qualitative systematic survey of definitions of clinical research quality.迈向综合框架的发展:临床研究质量定义的定性系统调查
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0180635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180635. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing biomedical data challenges and opportunities to inform a large-scale data lifecycle for enhanced data sharing, interoperability, analysis, and collaboration across stakeholders.应对生物医学数据挑战与机遇,为大规模数据生命周期提供信息,以加强各利益相关方之间的数据共享、互操作性、分析和协作。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 21;15(1):6291. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90453-x.
2
Standardized study performance, quality assurance, and quality control in a cluster-randomized trial: the Pneumococcal Vaccine Schedules trial.群组随机试验中的标准化研究绩效、质量保证和质量控制:肺炎球菌疫苗接种计划试验
Trials. 2024 Dec 18;25(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08677-7.
3
Developing a systematic approach to assessing data quality in secondary use of clinical data based on intended use.基于预期用途,制定一种系统的方法来评估临床数据二次使用中的数据质量。
Learn Health Syst. 2021 May 3;6(1):e10264. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10264. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Facilitating harmonized data quality assessments. A data quality framework for observational health research data collections with software implementations in R.促进数据质量评估的协调一致。具有 R 软件实现的观察性健康研究数据收集的数据质量框架。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 2;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01252-7.
5
A Rule-Based Data Quality Assessment System for Electronic Health Record Data.基于规则的数据质量评估系统在电子健康记录数据中的应用。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Aug;11(4):622-634. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715567. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Data Quality Management within Clinical Trials.探索临床试验中的数据质量管理。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan;9(1):72-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1621702. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Paperless clinical trials: Myth or reality?无纸化临床试验:神话还是现实?
Indian J Pharmacol. 2015 Jul-Aug;47(4):349-53. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.161247.
3
A Framework for Global Collaborative Data Management for Malaria Research.疟疾研究全球协作数据管理框架
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Sep;93(3 Suppl):124-132. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0003. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
4
A mixed-methods research approach to the review of competency standards for orthotist/prosthetists in Australia.一种用于审查澳大利亚矫形师/假肢师能力标准的混合方法研究途径。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Jun;13(2):93-103. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000038.
5
Transparent reporting of data quality in distributed data networks.分布式数据网络中数据质量的透明报告。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Mar 23;3(1):1052. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1052. eCollection 2015.
6
A review of data quality assessment methods for public health information systems.公共卫生信息系统数据质量评估方法综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 14;11(5):5170-207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505170.
7
Remote source document verification in two national clinical trials networks: a pilot study.两个国家临床试验网络中的远程源文件验证:一项试点研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 5;8(12):e81890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081890. eCollection 2013.
8
Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications.电子健康记录系统对信息完整性的影响:质量与安全方面的影响
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013 Oct 1;10(Fall):1c. eCollection 2013.
9
A systematic review of on-site monitoring methods for health-care randomised controlled trials.一项针对现场监测方法在卫生保健随机对照试验中应用的系统评价。
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):104-24. doi: 10.1177/1740774512467405.
10
A pragmatic framework for single-site and multisite data quality assessment in electronic health record-based clinical research.基于电子健康记录的临床研究中单站点和多站点数据质量评估的实用框架。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl(0):S21-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257dd67.

定义并开发一个临床研究数据质量监测的通用框架。

Defining and Developing a Generic Framework for Monitoring Data Quality in Clinical Research.

作者信息

Houston Miss Lauren, Yu A/Prof Ping, Martin Dr Allison, Probst Dr Yasmine

机构信息

School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia.

Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1300-1309. eCollection 2018.

PMID:30815172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6371251/
Abstract

Evidence for the need for high data quality in clinical research is well established. The rigor of clinical research conclusions rely heavily on good quality data, which relies on good documentation practices. Little attention has been given to clear guidelines and definitions to monitor data quality. To address this, a "fit-for-use" data quality monitoring framework (DQMF) for clinical research was developed based on a holistic design-oriented approach. An integrated literature review and feasibility study underpinned the framework development. Ontology of key terms, concepts, methods, and standards were recorded using a consensus approach and mind mapping technique. The DQMF is presented as a nested concentric network illustrating concept relationships and hierarchy. Face validation was conducted, and common terminology and definitions are listed. The consolidated DQMF can be adapted according to study context and data availability aiding in the development of a long-term strategy with increased efficacy for clinical data quality monitoring.

摘要

临床研究中对高数据质量的需求已有充分证据。临床研究结论的严谨性在很大程度上依赖于高质量的数据,而高质量的数据又依赖于良好的文档记录实践。对于监测数据质量的明确指南和定义关注甚少。为解决这一问题,基于整体设计导向方法开发了一个用于临床研究的“适用”数据质量监测框架(DQMF)。综合文献综述和可行性研究为框架开发提供了支撑。使用共识方法和思维导图技术记录关键术语、概念、方法和标准的本体。DQMF以嵌套同心圆网络的形式呈现,展示概念关系和层次结构。进行了表面效度验证,并列出了通用术语和定义。整合后的DQMF可根据研究背景和数据可用性进行调整,有助于制定长期策略,提高临床数据质量监测的效率。