Wu Yong, Zhao Pei, Li Wei, Cao Ming-Qiang, Du Lin, Chen Jian-Chang
Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University.
Department of Cardiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Hanjiang District, Yangzhou.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(9):e14707. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014707.
To systematically review the impact of remote health interventions based on an internet or mobile communication network on patients with hypertension and to provide a theoretical basis for hypertension patients with the implementation of remote health interventions.
Data were retrieved from a total of 4 Chinese databases and 3 foreign databases. The Chinese databases included: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, Chinese Biomedical Database (SinoMed), and Chongqing Chinese Science and Technology Journey database (VIP). The foreign language databases included PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and EMbase, and the date range for the search was from the date the database became active to December 1, 2018. After screening and extracting the materials and evaluating the risk of bias in each study (conducted by 2 researchers), the quality of the selected literature was evaluated by Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014, and the statistical analysis was applied by Stata 12.0 software.
This study will provide high-quality evidence-based medicine research evidence for remote health interventions on hypertensive patients based on the Internet and mobile communication network using systematic evaluation and meta-analysis methods.
This systematic review will provide a scientific conclusion as to whether the remote health intervention model based on an internet or mobile communication network can better control blood pressure and improve patient compliance than the traditional nursing intervention model for hypertensive patients.
This protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials does not require ethical approval and the results of this paper will be published in an open form in internationally influential academic journals.
A protocol had been registered in PROSPERO CRD42019122404.
系统评价基于互联网或移动通信网络的远程健康干预对高血压患者的影响，为高血压患者实施远程健康干预提供理论依据。
从4个中文数据库和3个外文数据库中检索数据。中文数据库包括：中国知网（CNKI）、万方数据、中国生物医学文献数据库（SinoMed）和重庆维普中文科技期刊数据库（VIP）。外文数据库包括PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和EMbase，检索日期范围为各数据库建库至2018年12月1日。在筛选和提取资料并评估每项研究的偏倚风险（由2名研究人员进行）后，采用Review Manager（RevMan）[计算机程序]对入选文献的质量进行评估。版本5.3。哥本哈根：北欧Cochrane中心，Cochrane协作网，2014年，并采用Stata 12.0软件进行统计分析。
本研究将采用系统评价和Meta分析方法，为基于互联网和移动通信网络的高血压患者远程健康干预提供高质量的循证医学研究证据。
本系统评价将得出科学结论，即基于互联网或移动通信网络的远程健康干预模式与传统护理干预模式相比，是否能更好地控制高血压患者的血压并提高患者依从性。
本随机对照试验系统评价和Meta分析方案无需伦理批准，本文结果将以开放形式发表在具有国际影响力的学术期刊上。
该方案已在PROSPERO CRD42019122404中注册。
