Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Faculty of Education, Mount Saint Vincent University, 166 Bedford Highway, Halifax, NS B3M 2J6, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 27;16(5):712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050712.
Supporting the implementation of school food and nutrition policies (SFNPs) is an international priority to encourage healthier eating among children and youth. Such policies can improve equitable access, resources, and supports for healthy eating. However, despite the potential impact of SFNPs, several implementation barriers have been reported. This study sought to examine the system-level intervention points within a school food system using a complex systems framework. We conducted semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders working to influence the school food system in Nova Scotia, Canada. We sought to understand their roles and experiences with the SFNP by applying the Intervention Level Framework (ILF), a novel, solutions-oriented approach to better understand how complex systems function. Participants (n = 33) included teachers, parents, cafeteria workers, public health staff and non-profit organizations. Interview transcripts were first coded, then themed and finally analyzed using the ILF, resulting in three intervention points within the school food system. These were defined as: (1) Actors and Elements, (2) System Regulation and Interconnections and (3) Purpose and Values. We concluded that understanding the interactions between these system levels and stakeholder roles can help to inform the development of relevant policy strategies that better support healthier school food environments in this jurisdiction.
支持学校食品和营养政策(SFNPs)的实施是鼓励儿童和青少年更健康饮食的国际优先事项。这些政策可以改善公平获得、资源和支持健康饮食的机会。然而,尽管 SFNPs 具有潜在影响,但已经报告了一些实施障碍。本研究旨在使用复杂系统框架检查学校食品系统中的系统级干预点。我们对在加拿大新斯科舍省努力影响学校食品系统的各种利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。我们通过应用干预级别框架(ILF)来了解他们在 SFNP 中的角色和经验,这是一种新颖的、面向解决方案的方法,可以更好地了解复杂系统的运作方式。参与者(n=33)包括教师、家长、食堂工作人员、公共卫生人员和非营利组织。访谈记录首先进行编码,然后进行主题分析,最后使用 ILF 进行分析,结果在学校食品系统中确定了三个干预点。这些被定义为:(1)行为者和要素,(2)系统监管和相互联系,(3)目的和价值观。我们得出的结论是,了解这些系统层面和利益相关者角色之间的相互作用,可以帮助制定相关政策策略,在该司法管辖区更好地支持更健康的学校食品环境。