• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

补片聚丙烯网片修补术是切口疝修补的可行选择吗?一项回顾性队列研究。

Is Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair an Available Option for Incisional Hernia Repair? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Cano-Valderrama Oscar, Porrero José L, Quirós Esther, Bonachia Oscar, Castillo María J, Cervantes Norman, Marcos Alberto, Torres Antonio J

出版信息

Am Surg. 2019 Feb 1;85(2):183-187.

PMID:30819296
Abstract

Lately, incisional hernia repair (IHR) with onlay polypropylene mesh has been replaced by other surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the complication and recurrence rate after onlay mesh repair and other surgical procedures for IHR. A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IHR in a single center was conducted. The data were obtained from electronic medical records. Patients who had been lost during follow-up were contacted for a visit in the clinic. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed with Stata 13.0 to analyze the factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence. Between June 2004 and December 2015, 1078 patients underwent IHR in a single center. Onlay mesh repair was performed in 125 patients (11.6%). Other surgical procedures included Rives procedure (29.3%), sublay mesh repair (38.6%), intrabdominal mesh repair (17.1%), and primary closure (3.4%). After a mean follow-up of 2.8 years, 73 (7%) patients developed a recurrence. A higher percentage of complications were seen after onlay mesh repair than after other surgical procedures (22.4% 13.1%, = 0.005). Nevertheless, recurrence was less frequent after onlay mesh repair (4.2% 7.1%, = 0.241). Logistic regression discarded an association between onlay mesh repair and hernia recurrence or postoperative complications. Incisional hernia repair with onlay polypropylene mesh repair was not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications or recurrence rate. So, this procedure should not be discarded in selected patients presenting with incisional hernia.

摘要

最近,采用聚丙烯补片修补的切口疝修补术(IHR)已被其他外科手术所取代。本研究的目的是比较聚丙烯补片修补术和其他IHR外科手术术后的并发症及复发率。对在单一中心接受IHR的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。数据取自电子病历。对失访患者进行门诊随访。使用Stata 13.0进行单因素和多因素分析,以分析与术后并发症及疝复发相关的因素。2004年6月至2015年12月期间,1078例患者在单一中心接受了IHR。125例患者(11.6%)接受了聚丙烯补片修补术。其他外科手术包括里夫斯手术(29.3%)、腹膜前补片修补术(38.6%)、腹腔内补片修补术(17.1%)和一期缝合(3.4%)。平均随访2.8年后,73例(7%)患者出现复发。聚丙烯补片修补术后出现并发症的比例高于其他外科手术(22.4%对13.1%,P = 0.005)。然而,聚丙烯补片修补术后复发较少见(4.2%对7.1%,P = 0.241)。逻辑回归分析排除了聚丙烯补片修补术与疝复发或术后并发症之间的关联。采用聚丙烯补片修补的切口疝修补术与术后并发症发生率较高或复发率无关。因此,对于某些切口疝患者,不应放弃该手术方法。

相似文献

1
Is Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair an Available Option for Incisional Hernia Repair? A Retrospective Cohort Study.补片聚丙烯网片修补术是切口疝修补的可行选择吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Am Surg. 2019 Feb 1;85(2):183-187.
2
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
Early Outcome after Sublay versus Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair for Ventral Midline Incisional Hernia - A Single Center Retrospective Analysis.经腹腔腹膜前修补术与网片上修补术治疗腹正中线切口疝的早期疗效 - 单中心回顾性分析。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2023 Dec;118(6):673-679. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.673.
4
Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: A randomized controlled trial.开放式经肌后间隙补片修补术与切口疝的上置修补术:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jan;37:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
Comparisons of Onlay versus Sublay Mesh Fixation Technique in Ventral Abdominal Wall Incisional Hernia Repair.腹直肌前鞘与腹直肌后鞘补片固定技术在腹壁切口疝修补术中的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Sep;29(9):819-822. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.09.819.
6
Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair.生物补片与异体补片在腹直肌切口疝修补术中的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Mar;403(2):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1639-9. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?对于腹腔镜修补大型切口疝,采用腹腔内置入补片并封闭筋膜缺损的方法是否优于标准的腹腔内置入补片法?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/ases.12471. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
[Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs].[切口疝手术25年经验。432例切口疝修补术的比较性回顾研究]
Chirurg. 2003 Jul;74(7):638-45. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0594-2.
9
Sutureless onlay hernia repair: a review of 97 patients.无缝合补片疝修补术:97例患者的回顾分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3256-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4647-2. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
10
Robotic-assisted ventral and incisional hernia repair with hernia defect closure and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) experience.机器人辅助腹侧和切口疝修补术,包括疝缺损闭合和腹膜内补片植入(IPOM)经验。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):695-701. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01040-y. Epub 2020 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective, Observational and Descriptive Study of 111 Ventral Hernia Repairs: Is the Open Approach Already over the Hill?一项对111例腹疝修补术的回顾性、观察性和描述性研究:开放手术是否已过时?
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 16;14(2):560. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020560.
2
Mesh exposure after ventral hernia repair with onlay biosynthetic mesh: a retrospective review of associated risk factors and management strategies.网片暴露后腹疝修补与生物合成网片:回顾性分析相关危险因素和管理策略。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2165-2176. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03108-7. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
3
Comment to: Umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis-a single-center experience. Porrero JL, Cano-Valderrama O, Villar S, et al.
对《复合假体脐疝修补术——单中心经验》的评论。作者:Porrero JL、Cano-Valderrama O、Villar S等。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):225-226. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01980-2. Epub 2019 May 27.