Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Jun;17(3):e494-e504. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
The incidence of node-positive prostate cancer has risen and might be partially explained by evolving use of lymphadenectomy at a population level. We assessed trends of node-positive prostate cancer in context of extent of lymphadenectomy among men treated surgically for prostate cancer.
This was a retrospective study using data from a population-based cancer registry to identify men older than 50 years of age diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2010 to 2015 without distant metastases. We considered extent of node dissection as ordinal (1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, ≥20) and dichotomous (1-14, ≥15) variables. We fit multivariable models to assess trends in receipt of extended lymphadenectomy and then estimated odds of node-positive cancer on the basis of extent of lymphadenectomy.
We identified 280,156 men diagnosed from 2010 to 2015; 5355 men (1.9%) had positive lymph nodes. Incidence of positive nodes increased from 6.4 to 8.4 cases per 100,000 men from 2010 to 2015 (standardized rate ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.44). Compared with 2010, prostatectomy patients with high-risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.42-1.95) and intermediate-risk tumors (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.47-1.88) were more likely to undergo extended lymphadenectomy in 2015. Among high-risk patients, men with ≥20 nodes removed were 7 times more likely to have positive nodes, versus <5 removed (6.1% for 1-4 vs. 32.4% for ≥20; OR, 7.32; 95% CI, 6.16-8.71). After adjusting for extent of dissection, odds of node-positive disease did not increase between 2010 and 2015 (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98-1.39) among high-risk patients.
Increased incidence of node-positive prostate cancer in the United States is partially explained by more frequent use of extended lymphadenectomy.
前列腺癌阳性淋巴结的发病率有所上升,部分原因可能是人群中淋巴结清扫术的应用不断发展。我们评估了前列腺癌患者手术治疗中淋巴结清扫范围与前列腺癌阳性淋巴结的关系。
本研究为回顾性研究,通过人群癌症登记处的数据,确定了 2010 年至 2015 年间年龄大于 50 岁且无远处转移的前列腺癌患者。我们将淋巴结清扫范围视为有序(1-4、5-9、10-14、15-19、≥20)和二分变量(1-14、≥15)。我们拟合了多变量模型来评估扩大淋巴结清扫的趋势,然后根据淋巴结清扫的范围估计阳性淋巴结癌的可能性。
我们共纳入 280156 例患者,其中 5355 例(1.9%)有阳性淋巴结。从 2010 年到 2015 年,阳性淋巴结的发病率从 6.4 例/100000 人增加到 8.4 例/100000 人(标准化率比,1.31;95%置信区间[CI],1.20-1.44)。与 2010 年相比,高危(比值比[OR],1.66;95%CI,1.42-1.95)和中危(OR,1.66;95%CI,1.47-1.88)肿瘤患者更有可能在 2015 年接受扩大淋巴结清扫术。在高危患者中,与切除<5 枚淋巴结相比,切除≥20 枚淋巴结的患者阳性淋巴结的可能性高 7 倍(切除 1-4 枚淋巴结的比例为 6.1%,切除≥20 枚淋巴结的比例为 32.4%;OR,7.32;95%CI,6.16-8.71)。在调整了清扫范围后,高危患者中 2010 年至 2015 年期间,阳性淋巴结病的可能性并没有增加(OR,1.17;95%CI,0.98-1.39)。
美国前列腺癌阳性淋巴结发病率的上升部分原因是扩大淋巴结清扫术的应用越来越频繁。