Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Eur J Pain. 2019 Jul;23(6):1185-1195. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1386. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
BACKGROUND: Many Osteoarthritis (OA) patients report with clinical features to their pain that cannot be explained by purely peripheral mechanisms. Yet, the analgesic agents available that tackle centrally driven chronic pain often provide only partial pain relief, or have dose-limiting side effects. We explored a combination therapy of the centrally acting analgesic agents tapentadol and pregabalin, to investigate if they could be used in combination to provide superior analgesia. METHODS: Using electrophysiological single-unit recordings taken from spinal wide dynamic range neurons, Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls (DNIC) were assessed as a marker of potential changes in descending controls in a monoiodoacetate (MIA) model of OA. We investigated if a subcutaneous injection of tapentadol or pregabalin, both alone and in combination, inhibited neuronal responses and restored the expression of DNIC, quantified as a reduction in neuronal firing in the presence of a conditioning noxious stimulus. RESULTS: Tapentadol restored DNIC-induced neuronal inhibition in MIA animals, while pregabalin inhibited pre-conditioned mechanically evoked neuronal responses but did not restore DNIC. Given in combination, tapentadol and pregabalin restored DNIC expression and also inhibited spinal neuronal responses. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that there is both central sensitization and an imbalance in inhibitory and facilitatory descending controls in MIA animals. The combination therapy of tapentadol and pregabalin restored descending noradrenergic inhibitory tone and also inhibited nociceptive transmission at the level of the spinal cord. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that pregabalin and tapentadol target different mechanisms of centrally driven chronic pain associated with osteoarthritis, and that when administered together can restore descending inhibitory tone whilst also tackling spinal neuronal hyperexcitability and may therefore provide superior analgesia.
背景:许多骨关节炎(OA)患者向医生报告其疼痛的临床特征不能单纯用外周机制来解释。然而,现有的针对中枢驱动性慢性疼痛的镇痛药物往往只能提供部分止痛效果,或者具有剂量限制的副作用。我们探索了中枢作用镇痛药物曲马多和普瑞巴林的联合治疗,以研究它们是否可以联合使用以提供更好的镇痛效果。
方法:使用来自脊髓宽动态范围神经元的电生理单细胞记录,作为潜在的下行控制变化的标志物,评估弥漫性伤害性抑制控制(DNIC)在单碘乙酸(MIA)OA 模型中。我们研究了曲马多或普瑞巴林单独和联合皮下注射是否抑制神经元反应并恢复 DNIC 的表达,DNIC 的表达通过在条件性伤害性刺激存在下减少神经元放电来量化。
结果:曲马多恢复了 MIA 动物中的 DNIC 诱导的神经元抑制,而普瑞巴林抑制了预先调节的机械诱发的神经元反应,但没有恢复 DNIC。联合使用时,曲马多和普瑞巴林恢复了 DNIC 的表达,并且还抑制了脊髓神经元反应。
结论:我们提出,MIA 动物既有中枢敏化,也有抑制性和兴奋性下行控制的不平衡。曲马多和普瑞巴林的联合治疗恢复了下行去甲肾上腺素抑制性张力,还抑制了脊髓水平的伤害性传入传递。
意义:这项研究表明,普瑞巴林和曲马多针对与骨关节炎相关的中枢驱动性慢性疼痛的不同机制,当联合使用时可以恢复下行抑制性张力,同时还可以解决脊髓神经元的过度兴奋,因此可能提供更好的镇痛效果。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019-1-3
Pain Physician. 2013-1
Pharmacol Ther. 2021-4
Can J Pain. 2020-1-23
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020-4
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016-2-27
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014-4-1
Lancet Neurol. 2013-9-25
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013-9-17
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013-5-2