Yamagata Kenji, Fukuzawa Satoshi, Kanno Naomi, Uchida Fumihiko, Yanagawa Toru, Bukawa Hiroki
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;77(7):1510-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.037. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
PURPOSE: Lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio of positive resected lymph nodes (LNs) to the total number of resected LNs, predicts survival for some solid tumors. This study investigated the value of LNR in the prognosis and postsurgical management of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors designed a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of patients who were diagnosed with OSCC and treated by neck dissection. The predictor was LNR and the outcome variable was overall survival (OS). Other variables were dissection type, postsurgical management, number of positive LNs, pN stage, nodal disease area, extracapsular spread, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and lymph duct invasion. Differences in OS rate were analyzed by log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for the effects of potential confounders. Differences with a P value less than .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In 95 patients with OSCC, the LNR cutoff value for predicting overall OS was 0.04 (area under the curve, 0.705; P = .010). There was a significant difference in OS when patients were stratified according to LNR (rate for low LNR, 90.5%; rate for high LNR, 68.8%; P = .014). Univariate analyses showed close correlations between OS and LNR, pT stage, number of positive LNs, and nodal disease area (levels IV and V). Cox multivariate analysis identified LNR (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.889; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.032-8.087; P = .043) and area of nodal disease (levels IV and V; HR = 5.149; 95% CI, 1.428-18.566; P = .012) as independent predictive factors for OS. OS differed significantly between the high-LNR and low-LNR groups treated by surgery alone (P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: As a predictive factor, high LNR (>0.04) was associated with decreased survival, and intensive adjuvant therapy could improve the prognosis for patients with high LNR.
目的:淋巴结比率(LNR)定义为切除的阳性淋巴结数量与切除的淋巴结总数之比,可预测某些实体瘤的生存率。本研究探讨了LNR在口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)预后及术后管理中的价值。 材料与方法:作者设计了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了经诊断为OSCC并接受颈清扫术治疗的患者样本。预测指标为LNR,结局变量为总生存期(OS)。其他变量包括清扫类型、术后管理、阳性淋巴结数量、pN分期、淋巴结病变区域、包膜外扩散、神经周围侵犯、血管侵犯和淋巴管侵犯。采用对数秩检验分析OS率的差异。使用Cox比例风险模型调整潜在混杂因素的影响。P值小于0.05的差异被认为具有统计学意义。 结果:在95例OSCC患者中,预测总体OS的LNR临界值为0.04(曲线下面积,0.705;P = 0.010)。根据LNR对患者进行分层时,OS存在显著差异(低LNR组的比率为90.5%;高LNR组的比率为68.8%;P = 0.014)。单因素分析显示OS与LNR、pT分期、阳性淋巴结数量和淋巴结病变区域(IV和V区)密切相关。Cox多因素分析确定LNR(风险比[HR]=2.889;95%置信区间[CI],1.032 - 8.087;P = 0.043)和淋巴结病变区域(IV和V区;HR = 5.149;95%CI,1.428 - 18.566;P = 0.012)为OS的独立预测因素。单纯手术治疗的高LNR组和低LNR组之间的OS存在显著差异(P = 0.027)。 结论:作为一个预测因素,高LNR(>0.04)与生存率降低相关,强化辅助治疗可改善高LNR患者的预后。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019-7
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024-6
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022-11
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017-11-26
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022-3
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023-3