Suppr超能文献

髌股关节不稳单纯远端复位手术的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析

The Outcomes of Isolated Distal Realignment Procedures in Patellofemoral Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tan Si Heng Sharon, Lim Sheng Yang, Wong Keng Lin, Doshi Chintan, Lim Andrew Kean Seng, Hui James Hoipo

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Orthopaedic, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Cluster, National University Health System (NUHS), Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2020 Jun;33(6):547-552. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1681052. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Abstract

Distal realignment procedures are now commonly performed routinely with proximal realignment procedures. Despite so, only a limited number of publications exist that have looked into the efficacy of isolated distal realignment procedures, and whether there is indeed a need for routine proximal realignment procedures to be added to the distal realignment procedures. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of isolated distal realignment procedures in the management of patellofemoral instability. The review was conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRSIMA) guidelines. All studies that reported the outcomes of isolated distal realignment procedures for patellofemoral instability were included. A total of six publications were included, with 347 knees. All studies consistently reported a decrease in the rates of patellofemoral instability or maltracking (odds ratio [OR]: < 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: < 0.01-0.01) and an increase in the odds of having a good outcome (OR: 0.01; 95% CI: < 0.01-0.02) after distal realignment procedures. A total of 24 out of 306 patients (7.8%) had postoperative instability or maltracking, and a total of 220 out of 303 patients (72.6%) were rated to have good or excellent outcomes postoperatively. Isolated distal realignment procedures can lead to good outcomes when used in the management of patellofemoral instability. These include a significantly decreased rate of patellofemoral instability or maltracking and a significantly increased number of patients with excellent or good outcomes postoperatively. Comparisons between patients with and without additional proximal realignment procedures suggest that additional proximal realignment procedures do not definitely improve the outcomes of distal realignment procedures and, therefore, should not be routinely performed in all patients undergoing distal realignment procedures. The Level of Evidence for this study is IV.

摘要

目前,远端重新排列手术通常与近端重新排列手术一起常规进行。尽管如此,仅有数量有限的出版物研究了单独的远端重新排列手术的疗效,以及是否确实需要在远端重新排列手术中常规增加近端重新排列手术。当前的系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估单独的远端重新排列手术治疗髌股关节不稳的疗效。该评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。纳入所有报告单独的远端重新排列手术治疗髌股关节不稳疗效的研究。共纳入6篇出版物,涉及347个膝关节。所有研究均一致报告,远端重新排列手术后髌股关节不稳或轨迹不良的发生率降低(优势比[OR]:<0.01;95%置信区间[CI]:<0.01 - 0.01),且获得良好疗效的几率增加(OR:0.01;95%CI:<0.01 - 0.02)。306例患者中有24例(7.8%)术后出现不稳或轨迹不良,303例患者中有220例(72.6%)术后被评为疗效良好或优秀。单独的远端重新排列手术用于治疗髌股关节不稳时可取得良好疗效。这些疗效包括髌股关节不稳或轨迹不良的发生率显著降低,以及术后疗效为优秀或良好的患者数量显著增加。对接受和未接受额外近端重新排列手术的患者进行比较表明,额外的近端重新排列手术不一定能改善远端重新排列手术的疗效,因此,不应在所有接受远端重新排列手术的患者中常规进行。本研究的证据级别为IV级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验