• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西部地区农民工灾难性卫生支出现状及其影响因素的实证分析。

Empirical Analysis of the Status and Influencing Factors of Catastrophic Health Expenditure of Migrant Workers in Western China.

机构信息

West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

School of Public Health, Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 1;16(5):738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050738.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16050738
PMID:30823652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6427712/
Abstract

To understand the current situation and influencing factors of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) of migrant workers in Western China. Sample data were obtained by cluster random sampling. Data were entered and sorted using Epidata 3.1 and SPSS 21.0. The statistical analysis involved a descriptive analysis, chi-square tests, multivariate unconditional logistic regression, and multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). A total of 1271 households were surveyed, and the incidence of CHE was 12.5% (159/1271). The multivariate logistic regression showed that households with elderly people over 65 years old (0R = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.42⁻2.97), children under five years old (0R = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.53⁻4.48), at least one person with no basic medical insurance (0R = 2.96, 95% CI = 2.08⁻4.23), chronically ill patients (0R = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.23⁻2.77), and hospitalized patients (0R = 3.61, 95% CI = 2.31⁻5.62) contributed to the risk of CHE. Compared to migrant workers in the >30,000 Yuan household per capita annual income group, the 10,001⁻20,000 Yuan income group (0R = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.44⁻3.82) and ≤10,000 Yuan income group (0R = 3.72, 95% CI = 2.09⁻6.62) had a higher risk of CHE occurrence. Compared to migrant workers in the university and above head-of-household education group, those in the primary level or below education group (0R = 5.90, 95% CI = 3.02⁻11.5) had a higher risk of CHE occurrence. MCA revealed a strong interrelationship between the following risk factors and CHE: household per capita annual income ≤10,000 Yuan, primary school education level or below for the head of the household, and having at least one person in the household with no basic medical insurance. CHE incidence amongst migrant workers in Western China is a serious issue, and policymakers should pay more attention to these migrant workers' households that are more prone to CHE than others, so as to decrease the incidence of CHE in this group.

摘要

为了解中国西部农民工灾难性卫生支出( CHE )的现状及其影响因素。采用整群随机抽样的方法获取样本数据。采用 Epidata 3.1 和 SPSS 21.0 进行数据录入和整理。统计分析包括描述性分析、卡方检验、多因素非条件 logistic 回归和多元对应分析( MCA )。共调查 1271 户家庭, CHE 发生率为 12.5%(159/1271)。多因素 logistic 回归显示,家中有 65 岁以上老人( OR = 2.05 , 95% CI = 1.42⁻2.97 )、5 岁以下儿童( OR = 2.61 , 95% CI = 1.53⁻4.48 )、至少一人无基本医疗保险( OR = 2.96 , 95% CI = 2.08⁻4.23 )、慢性病患者( OR = 1.85 , 95% CI = 1.23⁻2.77 )、住院患者( OR = 3.61 , 95% CI = 2.31⁻5.62 )的家庭, CHE 风险增加。与人均年收入 30000 元以上的农民工相比,10001⁻20000 元收入组( OR = 2.35 , 95% CI = 1.44⁻3.82 )和≤10000 元收入组( OR = 3.72 , 95% CI = 2.09⁻6.62 ) CHE 发生风险更高。与家庭中户主受教育程度为大学及以上的农民工相比,家庭中户主受教育程度为小学及以下的农民工( OR = 5.90 , 95% CI = 3.02⁻11.5 ) CHE 发生风险更高。 MCA 揭示了以下危险因素与 CHE 之间的强烈相互关系:家庭人均年收入≤10000 元、户主小学及以下教育水平、家庭中至少有一人无基本医疗保险。中国西部农民工 CHE 发生率较高,政策制定者应更加关注此类农民工家庭,这些家庭发生 CHE 的风险高于其他家庭,以降低该人群 CHE 的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dd6/6427712/2746d9f02abf/ijerph-16-00738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dd6/6427712/2746d9f02abf/ijerph-16-00738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dd6/6427712/2746d9f02abf/ijerph-16-00738-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Empirical Analysis of the Status and Influencing Factors of Catastrophic Health Expenditure of Migrant Workers in Western China.西部地区农民工灾难性卫生支出现状及其影响因素的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 1;16(5):738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050738.
2
Factors that determine catastrophic expenditure for tuberculosis care: a patient survey in China.决定结核病治疗灾难性支出的因素:一项中国患者调查
Infect Dis Poverty. 2016 Jan 25;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0100-6.
3
Cumulative incidence, distribution, and determinants of catastrophic health expenditure in Nepal: results from the living standards survey.尼泊尔灾难性卫生支出的累积发生率、分布和决定因素:来自生活水平调查的结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Feb 14;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0736-x.
4
A comparative study of catastrophic health expenditure in Zhejiang and Qinghai province, China.中国浙江省和青海省灾难性卫生支出的比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 9;18(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3658-9.
5
Decomposing inequality in catastrophic health expenditure for self-reported hypertension household in Urban Shaanxi, China from 2008 to 2013: two waves' cross-sectional study.2008年至2013年中国陕西城市自我报告高血压家庭灾难性卫生支出不平等分解:两波横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e023033. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023033.
6
Catastrophic health expenditures and its inequality in elderly households with chronic disease patients in China.中国慢性病患者老年家庭灾难性卫生支出及其不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Jan 20;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0134-6.
7
Catastrophic health expenditure: a comparative study between hypertensive patients with and without complication in rural Shandong, China.灾难性卫生支出:中国山东农村地区高血压伴发与不伴发并发症患者的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08662-0.
8
Effect of Critical Illness Insurance on Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure: The Latest Evidence from the National Health Service Survey in China.重大疾病保险对家庭灾难性卫生支出的影响:来自中国国家卫生服务调查的最新证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 13;16(24):5086. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245086.
9
Multimorbidity and catastrophic health expenditure: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.多病共存与灾难性卫生支出:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;10:1043189. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043189. eCollection 2022.
10
Factors influencing catastrophic health expenditure of households with people with diabetes in Northwest China-an example from Gansu Province.影响西北地区糖尿病患者家庭灾难性卫生支出的因素——以甘肃省为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09411-w.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of economic burden of disease on poverty among young migrant workers: evidence from China.疾病经济负担对青年农民工贫困的影响:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 7;13:1496014. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1496014. eCollection 2025.
2
Access to Healthcare Services among Thai Immigrants in Japan: A Study of the Areas Surrounding Tokyo.在日泰国移民获得医疗保健服务的情况:以东京周边地区为例的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 4;20(13):6290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136290.
3
Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure Among Migrant Workers in India: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequalities in Household Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Impoverishment Associated With Noncommunicable Diseases in Chi Linh, Hai Duong, Vietnam.越南海阳省吉灵市家庭灾难性卫生支出及与非传染性疾病相关的贫困问题中的不平等现象。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017 Jul;29(5_suppl):35S-44S. doi: 10.1177/1010539517712919.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment associated with non-communicable diseases in urban Hanoi, Vietnam.越南河内市非传染性疾病相关灾难性医疗支出及贫困方面的社会经济不平等现象。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Oct 13;15(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0460-3.
3
印度农民工的自付医疗费用:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2022 Oct 31;14(10):e30948. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30948. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Spatial Analysis and Comparison of the Economic Burden of Common Diseases: An Investigation of 5.7 Million Rural Elderly Inpatients in Southeast China, 2010-2016.常见疾病经济负担的空间分析与比较:对2010 - 2016年中国东南部570万农村老年住院患者的调查
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;9:774342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.774342. eCollection 2021.
5
Measurement and determinants of catastrophic health expenditure among elderly households in China using longitudinal data from the CHARLS.利用 CHARLS 纵向数据测量和分析中国老年家庭灾难性卫生支出及其决定因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Feb 19;20(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01336-8.
6
Catastrophic health expenditure: A comparative analysis of smoking and non-smoking households in China.灾难性卫生支出:中国吸烟家庭和非吸烟家庭的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233749. eCollection 2020.
Catastrophic Health Expenditure After the Implementation of Health Sector Evolution Plan: A Case Study in the West of Iran.
卫生部门改革计划实施后灾难性卫生支出的案例研究:伊朗西部。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jul 1;5(7):417-423. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.31.
4
Catastrophic health expenditure: a comparative analysis of empty-nest and non-empty-nest households with seniors in Shandong, China.灾难性卫生支出:中国山东省有老年人的空巢家庭与非空巢家庭的比较分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 5;6(7):e010992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010992.
5
Catastrophic Health Care Expenditure among Older People with Chronic Diseases in 15 European Countries.15个欧洲国家中患有慢性病的老年人的灾难性医疗支出
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 5;11(7):e0157765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157765. eCollection 2016.
6
Mental wellbeing amongst younger and older migrant workers in comparison to their urban counterparts in Guangzhou city, China: a cross-sectional study.中国广州市年轻和年长农民工与城市同龄人心理健康状况的比较:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 16;14:1280. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1280.
7
Immigration as a social determinant of health.移民是健康的社会决定因素。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:375-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182419. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
8
Household financial contribution to the health System in Shiraz, Iran in 2012.2012 年伊朗设拉子的家庭对卫生系统的财务贡献。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Sep 17;3(5):243-9. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.87. eCollection 2014 Oct.
9
Immigrants' health and health inequality by type of integration policies in European countries.欧洲国家中按融合政策类型划分的移民健康与健康不平等状况。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Apr;25(2):293-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku156. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
10
Socioeconomic inequality in catastrophic health expenditure in Brazil.巴西灾难性卫生支出中的社会经济不平等。
Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Aug;48(4):632-41. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005111.