Suppr超能文献

CT 成像史对因肾绞痛就诊于急诊科的患者——多医院数据库的证据。

CT imaging history for patients presenting to the ED with renal colic--evidence from a multi-hospital database.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, CHRISTUS Health/Texas A&M School of Medicine, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.

Texas Tech University School of Medicine, Bullock, Lubbock, TX, USA.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 1;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0232-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with renal colic have a 7% chance of annual recurrence. Previous studies evaluating cumulative Abbreviations: computed tomography (CT) exposure for renal colic patients were typically from single centers.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study. Inner-city ED patients with a final diagnosis of renal colic were prospectively identified (1/10/16-10/16/16). Authors conducted structured electronic record reviews from a 6-hospital system encompassing over 192,000 annual ED visits. Categorical data analyzed by chi-square; continuous data by t-tests. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of study group patients with prior history CT abdomen/pelvis CT.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirteen patients in the study group; 59% male, age 38+/- 10 years, 67% Hispanic, 62% prior stone history, flank pain (78%), dysuria (22%), UA (+) blood (75%). 60% (95% CI = 53-66%) of patients received an EDCV CT; hydronephrosis seen in 55% (95% CI = 46-63%), stone in 90%(95% CI = 83-94%). No significant differences observed in the proportion of EDCV patients who received CT with respect to: female vs. male (62% vs. 56%; p = 0.4), mean age (37+/- 9 years vs. 39+/- 11 years; p = 0.2), and Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic white (63% vs.63%; p = 0.96). Patients with a prior stone history were more likely than those with no history to receive an EDCV CT (88% vs. 16%; p < 0.001). 118 (55%; 95% CI = 49-62%) of patients had at least one prior CT, 46 (22%; 95% CI = 16-28%) had ≥3 prior CTs; 29 (14%; 95% CI = 10-19%), ≥ 10 prior CTs. Patients who did not receive an EDCV CT had a significantly higher mean prior number of CTs than those who had EDCV CT (5.1+/- 7.7 vs 2.2+/- 4.9; p < 0.001). Patients with prior stone were more likely to receive only U/S during EDCV (33% vs. 15%; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Within our EDCV cohort of renal colic patients, 55% had at least one prior CT. The mean number of prior CTs was lower for patients receiving CT on EDCV, and Ultrasound (US) alone was used more often in patients with prior stone history vs. those with no prior history.

摘要

背景

患有肾绞痛的患者每年有 7%的复发几率。以往评估肾绞痛患者累积 CT 暴露情况的研究通常来自单一中心。

方法

这是一项观察性队列研究。内城急诊患者的最终诊断为肾绞痛,前瞻性地确定了(1/10/16-10/16/16)。作者从一个涵盖超过 192000 次年度急诊就诊的 6 家医院系统中进行了结构化电子病历回顾。使用卡方检验分析分类数据;使用 t 检验分析连续数据。主要结局指标是研究组中既往有腹部/骨盆 CT 史的患者比例。

结果

研究组共 213 例患者;59%为男性,年龄 38+/-10 岁,67%为西班牙裔,62%有结石病史,腰痛(78%),尿痛(22%),尿酸性(75%)。60%(95%CI=53-66%)的患者接受了 EDCV CT;55%(95%CI=46-63%)的患者有肾积水,90%(95%CI=83-94%)的患者有结石。在接受 EDCV CT 的患者中,无论女性与男性(62%与 56%;p=0.4)、平均年龄(37+/-9 岁与 39+/-11 岁;p=0.2)或西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人(63%与 63%;p=0.96),接受 CT 的比例均无显著差异。有结石病史的患者比无结石病史的患者更有可能接受 EDCV CT(88%与 16%;p<0.001)。118 例(55%;95%CI=49-62%)患者至少有一次既往 CT,46 例(22%;95%CI=16-28%)有≥3 次既往 CT,29 例(14%;95%CI=10-19%)有≥10 次既往 CT。未接受 EDCV CT 的患者的平均既往 CT 数量明显高于接受 EDCV CT 的患者(5.1+/-7.7 与 2.2+/-4.9;p<0.001)。有结石病史的患者在 EDCV 期间更有可能仅接受 US(33%与 15%;p=0.003)。

结论

在我们的 EDCV 肾绞痛患者队列中,55%的患者至少有一次既往 CT。接受 EDCV CT 的患者既往 CT 数量平均较少,且有结石病史的患者与无结石病史的患者相比,更多地使用 US 进行诊断。

相似文献

4
Does diagnosis change as a result of repeat renal colic computed tomography scan in patients with a history of kidney stones?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;28(3):291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.11.024. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
5
Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Severity of Hydronephrosis and Its Importance in Renal Colic.
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):559-568. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.04.33119. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Appropriate use of CT for patients presenting with suspected renal colic: a quality improvement study.
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Dec 2;8(4):e000470. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000470. eCollection 2019.
9
Does computed tomographic scan affect diagnosis and management of patients with suspected renal colic?
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;32(4):367-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.12.031. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
10
The Incidence and Risk Factors for Emergency Department Imaging in Acute Renal Colic.
J Endourol. 2023 Jul;37(7):834-842. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0068.

本文引用的文献

2
Imaging patients with renal colic-consider ultrasound first.
Insights Imaging. 2015 Aug;6(4):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0396-y. Epub 2015 May 21.
3
Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1100-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404446.
5
Trends in imaging use during the emergency department evaluation of flank pain.
J Urol. 2011 Dec;186(6):2270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.079. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
6
Radiological imaging of patients with suspected urinary tract stones: national trends, diagnoses, and predictors.
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;18(7):699-707. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01103.x.
7
Cumulative CT exposures in emergency department patients evaluated for suspected renal colic.
J Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;33(2):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.12.035. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
8
Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Apr;186(4):1120-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1838.
9
Estimation of cancer mortality associated with repetitive computed tomography scanning.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan 15;173(2):199-203. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200505-810OC. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
10
Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening.
Radiology. 2004 Sep;232(3):735-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2323031095. Epub 2004 Jul 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验