• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Referral of patients with cancer for participation in randomized clinical trials: ethical considerations.

作者信息

Levine R J

出版信息

CA Cancer J Clin. 1986 Mar-Apr;36(2):95-9. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.36.2.95.

DOI:10.3322/canjclin.36.2.95
PMID:3082491
Abstract

Physicians with patients with cancer may be faced with two conflicting ethical obligations. One is to contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge. Among the ways available to respond to this duty is to refer patients for participation in RCTs. The second obligation is to serve the health interests of the individual patient. When these two duties conflict, the latter obligation to the individual takes priority. In the words of the Declaration of Helsinki, "Concern for the interests of the subject (patient) must always prevail over the interests of science and society." Quite often there is no conflict. The patient can pursue his or her health interests most effectively by enrollment in an RCT. In such cases, the referring physician can contribute to the success of the patient's participation in the RCT by explaining what the patient can expect to experience as a patient-subject. It is usually important to explain that referral does not necessarily entail severing the original doctor-patient relationship.

摘要

相似文献

1
Referral of patients with cancer for participation in randomized clinical trials: ethical considerations.
CA Cancer J Clin. 1986 Mar-Apr;36(2):95-9. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.36.2.95.
2
Leaving therapy to chance.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1983 Aug;13(4):40-7.
3
Ethical problems in clinical trials.
J Med Philos. 1986 Nov;11(4):297-315. doi: 10.1093/jmp/11.4.297.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
The conflict between randomized clinical trials and the therapeutic obligation.随机临床试验与治疗义务之间的冲突
J Med Philos. 1986 Nov;11(4):347-66. doi: 10.1093/jmp/11.4.347.
6
Consent and randomized clinical trials: are there moral or design problems?同意与随机临床试验:是否存在道德或设计问题?
J Med Philos. 1986 Nov;11(4):317-45. doi: 10.1093/jmp/11.4.317.
7
Proposal for ethical standards in therapeutic trials.治疗性试验伦理标准提案。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Sep 28;291(6499):887-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6499.887.
8
Ethical considerations of metabolic research in alcoholic patients.酒精性患者代谢研究的伦理考量。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1977 Jul;1(3):193-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1977.tb05871.x.
9
Is there really an ethical conflict in clinical trials?
Cancer. 1995 May 15;75(10):2407-9; discussion 2410-1. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950515)75:10<2407::aid-cncr2820751003>3.0.co;2-x.
10
How to resolve an ethical dilemma concerning randomized clinical trials.如何解决关于随机临床试验的伦理困境。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):691-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410912.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the benefits and burdens associated with a malaria human infection study in Kenya: experiences of study volunteers and other stakeholders.了解肯尼亚一项疟疾人体感染研究的益处与负担:研究志愿者及其他利益相关者的经历
Trials. 2021 Jul 26;22(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05455-7.
2
Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial.非临床试验中早期乳腺癌女性不同治疗策略的心理结局
BMJ. 1990 Sep 22;301(6752):575-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6752.575.
3
Clinical trials and physicians as double agents.
临床试验与作为双重角色的医生。
Yale J Biol Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;65(2):65-74.