Heusdens Christiaan H W, Tilborghs Sam, Dossche Lieven, Van Dyck Pieter
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:469-475.
A posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture is less common than an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. PCL reconstruction remains controversial with variable outcomes and problems. The encouraging results of the novel ACL repair techniques led to renewed interest in PCL repair. Primary arthroscopic PCL repair has been rarely discussed and literature is scarce. To the best of our knowledge, no PCL repair patient outcome has been reported with one of the novel PCL repair techniques. We present the first case report of two patients who have been treated with the novel PCL repair technique, the suture tape augmentation technique.
Two patients who underwent primary PCL repair after an acute PCL rupture with a two-year follow up are presented. Patients were evaluated according to the Lysholm scale, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Tegner activity scale. Follow up also included objective physical examinations-knee function and posterior drawer test using a rolimeter-and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Physical examinations were performed at three months, six months, one year, and two years after surgery.
At two-year follow up, both patients had a full range of motion and experienced no pain, nor swelling. IKDC scores were 83% (good) and 100% (excellent), Lysholm scores were 99 and 100 two years after surgery. At three months postoperative, the Tegner activity scale equaled the preinjury Tegner activity scale. One patient was horseback riding within three months. There were some increased posterior translation differences after two years-+2 and +3mm-compared with six weeks postoperative. MRI showed a healed PCL in both cases.
PCL repair could be a promising treatment option for acute PCL ruptures. Advantages of this technique are the retaining of the natural proprioceptive capacities due to preserving native PCL fibers, the surgical technique is less invasive compared to a reconstruction, and no donor graft morbidity is expected as no graft is needed.
In these two cases, good subjective and objective results are demonstrated after PCL repair using the novel suture tape augmentation technique. MRI confirmed the healing of the PCL. Although this is a small case series, as PCL ruptures are less common compared to ACL ruptures, it is a stepping-stone for further PCL repair research.
后交叉韧带(PCL)断裂比前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂少见。PCL重建的效果和问题存在争议。新型ACL修复技术取得的令人鼓舞的结果引发了对PCL修复的新兴趣。原发性关节镜下PCL修复很少被讨论,相关文献也很匮乏。据我们所知,尚无采用新型PCL修复技术治疗PCL修复患者的结果报告。我们报告首例采用新型PCL修复技术即缝线带增强技术治疗的两名患者的病例。
介绍两名急性PCL断裂后接受原发性PCL修复并随访两年的患者。根据Lysholm量表、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)和Tegner活动量表对患者进行评估。随访还包括客观体格检查——膝关节功能以及使用旋转计进行后抽屉试验——和磁共振成像(MRI)。在术后三个月、六个月、一年和两年进行体格检查。
在两年随访时,两名患者均具有全范围活动度,无疼痛和肿胀。IKDC评分分别为83%(良好)和100%(优秀),术后两年Lysholm评分分别为99和100。术后三个月时,Tegner活动量表评分与伤前Tegner活动量表评分相当。一名患者在三个月内就开始骑马。与术后六周相比,两年后有一些后向平移差异增加,分别为+2和+3毫米。MRI显示两例患者的PCL均愈合。
PCL修复可能是急性PCL断裂一种有前景的治疗选择。该技术的优点包括由于保留了天然PCL纤维而保留了自然本体感受能力,与重建相比手术侵入性较小,并且由于不需要移植物,预计不会出现供体移植物相关并发症。
在这两例病例中,采用新型缝线带增强技术进行PCL修复后取得了良好的主观和客观结果。MRI证实了PCL的愈合。尽管这是一个小病例系列,但由于PCL断裂比ACL断裂少见,它是进一步PCL修复研究的垫脚石。