• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

编辑评论:单排与双排阔筋膜张肌腱修复术:收益是否大于代价?

Editorial Commentary: Single Versus Double-Row Abductor Tendon Repair: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):824-825. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.044.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.044
PMID:30827435
Abstract

Anatomical understanding of the peritrochanteric space and abductor insertions has been well documented in the literature. Extrapolating this knowledge to perform a "successful" abductor tendon repair has led to controversy over the best method to achieve a durable, stable repair and improve patient outcomes. I feel that the debate in the hip over single- versus double-row fixation is only beginning and we are in for a ride to uncover the best method, as we have with the shoulder over the last 15 years. What is best? Single or double row?

摘要

关于髋关节外展肌肌腱修复术的研究中,对阔筋膜张肌和臀中肌止点的解剖学理解已有充分的文献记载。这些知识的应用,为“成功”完成髋关节外展肌肌腱修复术提供了理论依据,同时也引发了关于实现持久、稳定修复并改善患者预后的最佳方法的争议。我认为,髋关节中单排固定与双排固定的争论才刚刚开始,正如过去 15 年来我们在肩部所经历的那样,我们将有机会探索出最佳的方法。哪种方法最好?单排还是双排?

相似文献

1
Editorial Commentary: Single Versus Double-Row Abductor Tendon Repair: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?编辑评论:单排与双排阔筋膜张肌腱修复术:收益是否大于代价?
Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):824-825. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.044.
2
Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study.关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥技术治疗 55 岁以下肩袖撕裂患者的前瞻性对比研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):116-121. doi: 10.1177/0363546517728718. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
3
Rotator Cuff Repair: Single Row Repair Versus Double Row Repair and Superior Capsular Reconstruction.肩袖修复:单排修复与双排修复及上盂唇重建
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2018 Dec;26(4):171-175. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000228.
4
Editorial Commentary: Improving Strength and Clinical Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair-Role of Choosing Single- Versus Double-Row Repair.编辑评论:改善肩袖修补术后的力量和临床结果-选择单排与双排修补的作用。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Sep;35(9):2756-2758. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.04.032.
5
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in 2019: Linked, Double Row Repair for Achieving Higher Healing Rates and Optimal Clinical Outcomes.2019 年关节镜下肩袖修复术:采用连接、双排修复以实现更高的愈合率和最佳临床效果。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Sep;35(9):2749-2755. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.048.
6
Long-term Results of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Follow-up Study Comparing Single-Row Versus Double-Row Fixation Techniques.关节镜肩袖修复的长期结果:单排与双排固定技术的随访比较研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1568-1574. doi: 10.1177/0363546520919120. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Editorial Commentary: Does a Medialized Repair Allow Single-Row to Outperform Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair?社论评论:内侧化修复能否使单排优于双排肩袖修复?
Arthroscopy. 2019 Oct;35(10):2814-2816. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.010.
8
[Rotator cuff repair: single- vs double-row. Clinical and biomechanical results].[肩袖修复:单排与双排。临床及生物力学结果]
Orthopade. 2016 Feb;45(2):118-24. doi: 10.1007/s00132-015-3210-0.
9
Increased acromiohumeral distance in a double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery compared to a single-row surgery after 12 months.相较于单排手术,双排关节镜下肩袖修复术后 12 个月时肩峰肱骨头间距增加。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jun 16;16(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02523-1.
10
Clinical evidence shows no difference between single- and double-row repair for rotator cuff tears.临床证据表明,肩袖撕裂的单排修复和双排修复之间没有差异。
Arthroscopy. 2007 Jun;23(6):670-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.031.