Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
J Surg Educ. 2019 May-Jun;76(3):881-892. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.11.002. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
There is a need for meaningful and reliable measures of surgical competency in residency education. The goal of the current study is to incorporate the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE) into the process of resident evaluation at our institution and to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of its use through a web-based platform.
This is a feasibility study that prospectively assesses the implementation of a web-based O-SCORE at our institution. Over a 16-week period, 19 orthopedic surgery residents (PGY2-PGY5) participated in a quality improvement study, which involved collecting 2 feedback forms per week. Each form consisted of a resident form and a linked attending form. At the conclusion of the 16-week trial period, residents and faculty members were asked to complete a survey about their perceptions of the O-SCORE program.
An academic medical center.
The study included only residents in postgraduate training years (PGY) 2 through 5 (n = 20) and attendings (n = 37).
During the 16-week study period, 608 resident surveys were requested for the 19 participating residents, of which 404 surveys (66.5%) were completed. Faculty completed 207 of 326 surveys for an overall compliance rate of 63.5%. The O-SCORE was able to significantly differentiate between all training years (p < 0.0001) with the exception of PGY3 residents when compared to PGY4 residents. Overall, residents and faculty found the program valuable and feasible. Resident and faculty perception of the value of the O-SCORE correlated with compliance rate of the O-SCORE surveys.
This study demonstrates that implementation of an immediate feedback program utilizing an electronic platform is achievable and offers reproducible construct validity. However, issues affecting compliance among both residents and faculty physicians must temper optimism for the program and should be systematically addressed to allow for successful implementation.
住院医师教育中需要有意义且可靠的手术能力衡量标准。本研究的目的是将渥太华手术能力手术室评估(O-SCORE)纳入我们机构的住院医师评估流程,并通过基于网络的平台评估其使用的可行性和有效性。
这是一项前瞻性评估我们机构基于网络的 O-SCORE 实施情况的可行性研究。在 16 周的时间里,19 名骨科住院医师(PGY2-PGY5)参与了一项质量改进研究,每周收集 2 份反馈表。每份表格包括一份住院医师表格和一份关联的主治医生表格。在 16 周试验期结束时,要求住院医师和教员完成一项关于他们对 O-SCORE 计划看法的调查。
一家学术医疗中心。
该研究仅包括住院医师培训年限为 2 至 5 年(PGY)的住院医师(n=20)和主治医生(n=37)。
在 16 周的研究期间,为 19 名参与的住院医师共请求了 608 份住院医师调查,其中完成了 404 份(66.5%)。教员完成了 326 份调查中的 207 份,总体合规率为 63.5%。O-SCORE 能够显著区分所有培训年限(p<0.0001),除了 3 年级住院医师与 4 年级住院医师相比。总的来说,住院医师和教员认为该计划有价值且可行。住院医师和教员对 O-SCORE 价值的看法与 O-SCORE 调查的合规率相关。
本研究表明,实施利用电子平台的即时反馈计划是可行的,并提供可重复的结构有效性。然而,影响住院医师和主治医生合规性的问题必须抑制对该计划的乐观情绪,应系统地解决这些问题,以确保计划的成功实施。